Thoughts (and graphs!) on yesterday’s midterm elections

 

 - by New Deal democrat

Well, that was exciting, wasn’t it?

Before I return to my usual economic nerdiness, here’s a few graphs that have stood out to me so far about last night’s election.

First, it looks like Democrats outperformed the polling average by about 1%-2%. That was enough to carry a bunch of “too close to call” races across the finish line. How big a tsunami was it? 

Well, Democrats in total outvoted GOPers by about 13%, the biggest such outperformance by either party since 1976:

So the framing that this election would be “2018+” appears vindicated, as well as that the GOP would suffer its worst shellacking since 1974. In that year, Democrats picked up 49 seats, which in modern times was only surpassed by the GOP pickup of 54 seats in 1994. It’s possible that could be surpassed this year, once all the votes are counted, but even if not, it will be a very large increase

Democrats now control every US Senate seat in the Northeast except for 1 in PA, and including the Great Lakes States, the GOP only has one each in OH and WI, as well as both in IN. Further, Democratic dominance in the Senate extends all the way down the Atlantic Coast to the FL State line, as well as the West Coast:

When we include control of State governments, here is the updated map we get:

The GOP is dominant in Appalachia, the lower Mississippi valley, the Gulf Coast, and the Northern tier of thinly populated mountain and high plains States, and almost nowhere else.

The biggest earthquake of all last night has to be Texas, where not only did we pick up the US Senate seat, but also the Governorship, and control of one of the two State Legislative Chambers. There is still work to do to pick up the second chamber, and of course the GOP “dummymander” is in place until we can manage a trifecta, or after the 2030 Census, whichever comes first.

Further, both NC and GA appear to be following VA’s trajectory on the East Coast. Although the NC Congressional “dummymander” backfired, with a majority of Congressional seats now held by Democrats, the state level legislative gerrymanders will still have to be overcome.

And finally, my pet project of Kansas bore fruit last night, with both the US Senate seat flipping Blue, and the Democrat also claiming victory in the Governor’s race. Only the lower House of the state legislature was up for election last night, and while the Democrats didn’t win, they broke the GOP supermajority.

Lastly, the generational shift to Democrats was also apparent last night:

When the younger Democratic cohorts come out to vote, Democrats win. Among older voters, the GOP majority isn’t so much the bulk of Boomers, but rather “generation Jones” and Gen-X, i.e., those people born in the 1960s and early 1970s who formed their core political beliefs during the Carter/Reagan/ GWBush years, and are at their peak propensity to vote now.

Thoughts on today’s midterm elections

 

 - by New Deal democrat

My thoughts on how today’s midterm elections might shake out are expressed pretty well by this thread by MTSW on Bluesky:

Recall that poll forecasts themselves, in addition to all the problems he cites, *themselves* move the electorate, as do reports on who has been voting early. So I expect the polls to be wrong. The question is, how broadly and in which direction? There’s evidence that late deciders have been shifting towards Democrats, but that’s about as far as I trust those results.

But I think the above framing is a good one: today is likely to be “2018+.” The anti-T—-p hatred is hotter. Unlike past elections, his demand for total devotion means that no GOPer’s have been able to run campaigns based on their alleged “independence” or bipartisan credentials. In November 2018 consumer inflation was 2.5% YoY, and gas cost $2.86/gallon. T—-p hadn’t gotten the US involved in a war; and the 2018 tax cuts, as opposed to last year’s Big Bad Billiionnaire Bust-Out Bill, didn’t come into effect until after the midterm elections.

So while in my head I am very cautious, in my heart I am expectiing a 1974-style shellacking. We’ll see.

What I will be watching:

1. Per Dan Guild, Florida counts its votes very quickly. Frequently you will know how the vote has been breaking by 8:30 pm eastern time, and almost certainly by 9 pm. While the gerrymanders are likely to work, there is a governor’s race, where the average poll has the Democrat losing by about 4%. This in contrast to the 58% to 40% blowout in 2022, and the 52% to 47% loss in 2018. So I will be looking to see how the governor’s race appears to be panning out compared with those benchmarks. 

2. Two Senate contests on the East Coast can also give us some early information: Susan Collins in Maine (D+3% on average) and Lindsay Graham’s sister in SC (D-1% on average). If either of those gets called early - and in which direction - it will give us a good sense of how other races are likely to break.

3. Three Congressional races in the Virginia Tidewater: VA-2, -1, and -5. VA-2, which includes lot of military voters in places like Virginia Beach, has been perennially close, on the order of 51%-49% to 53%-47% in favor of whichever party goes on to win nationwide. I will be looking to see who wins, and whether there is a breakout towards the Democratic side. The other two districts have been rated “toss-up” (VA-1) and “lean GOP” (VA-5). But the former averaged a 10%-13% in favor of the GOP incumbent in 2018, 2022, and 2024. In the latter district, the lean has been in favor of the GOP by 6% in 2018, and about 15% in 2022 and 2024. If either of these flip, it will be a very bad night for the GOP. If both do, it will be catastrophic. Even if they don’t flip, it the GOP margin is close enough, it will be a long night for the GOP nationwide.

4. A few outliers: Did voters in Michigan who responded to polls hide anti-MOOSlim feeling? If so, El Sayed might lose. Have White voters in the Deep South been enervated by the economy and/or corruption, vs. Black voters burning with homicidal rage at the gutting of the VRA? If so, there could be upsets where Black Democratic candidates in Mississippi, Arkansas, and/or Louisiana pull off victories.

We’ll find out soon enough.

September JOLTS report: another indication of an improved labor market

 

 - by New Deal democrat

This morning’s JOLTS labor market report for September, which parses labor market turnover by hires, layoffs, and quits, among other things, continued the string of positive trends in this sector this year, as all four major components moved in a good direction.

The first graph below shows the “soft statistic” of job openings (blue), actual hires (red), and quits (gold), all normed to 100 as of just before the pandemic:

Both hires and quits have had a sideways trend for the past two years. As noted above, in September all of these improved. Hires increased 131,000 to 5.402 million, and were up 3.4% YoY. Quits increased 321,000 to 3.365 million and were up 4.9% YoY. The “soft” metric of openings, which has had a slightly increasing trend this year, and outside of recessions for the past 25 years, increased 343,000 to 7.523 million, and were up 4.9% YoY. Nevertheless, both hires and quits remain below their pre-pandemic levels of 2019.

Here is the same graph for layoffs, which declined -127,000 to 1.641 million, and were down -9.6% YoY:

Layoffs have been running at close to their lowest post-pandemic levels over the past ten months, and their declining trend since late last year is of a piece with what we have been seeing in the very low level of initial and continuing jobless claims each week.

Let’s also update the comparison of the quits rate (blue, right scale), which has been suggested to lead YoY average hourly wages (red, left scale):

Like the number of hires and quits, for the past year the quits rate has been close to completely flat. That argues that *nominally* average hourly wages YoY should be stabilizing at a 3.4%-3.5% rate. 

Last month I concluded that “the general takeaway from this report is a jobs sector that has normalized in a low hire, low fire trend.” This month I can add that the trend, like other reports from the labor market, has been improving.

In the goods producing sector, AI continues to soar, and everything else continues to languish

 

 - by New Deal democrat

As usual, we start out the month with reports on two important sectors of the economy, manufacturing and construction, via the ISM manufacturing report (for October) and the construction spending report (for September). And the economy continues to look as it has all year, with an inflationary expansion in manufacturing, and lackluster construction with the huge exception of AI data centers.

Let’s start with the ISM manufacturing report. Between this report and the ISM services report which will be released on Wednesday, we get an excellent snapshot of the economy at the beginning of each month. The former in particular has been around for almost 80 years, and has had an excellent record. 

The headline index rose +1.0 for the month to 55.5. For forecasting purposes, I average the last three months, which comes out to 54.9 (recall that the dividing line between expansion in contraction is 50):

The more leading new orders subindex rose +0.2 to 55.5, although the three month average declined slightly to 54.8:

The upshot of these two numbers is that the manufacturing expansion can be expected to continue at least through the end of this year.

Recently the employment subindex in this report has also improved into expansion, albeit at a subdued level. This also continued this month, as it declined -0.3 to 52.4. The three month average also declined slightly, by -0.1, to 52.1:

Finally, the negative new on inflation also continued this month, as the prices paid subindex declined -2.7 to 75.2. The three month average, however, rose +1.4 to 74.8, rising even closer to its post-pandemic inflationary peak:

This report reminded me of the regional Fed reports for the last month, which suggested that while the expansion is intact, the second derivative may be declerating, i.e., the rate of growth has been peaking; and further that its inflationary component is accelerating, which is not good for downstream consumer prices.

Finally, keep in mind that for forecasting purposes, I weigh manufacturing at 25%, and the other 75% from the ISM services report, which has been running quite positive for many months.

If manufacturing is in good shape (except for prices), construction is not in good shape at all - except for AI data center construction. Nominally total construction (blue in the graph below) declilned -1.9% in September, and is down -2.7% YoY. The more leading residential construction sector (red) also declined, by -5.4% for the month, and is down -8.8% YoY. Since the price of construction materials (not shown) rose 0.7% in September and was up 17.0% YoY, the declines were even more negative. Here’s the absolute values nominally:

And here are the YoY% comparisons:

The particularly important negative is that residential construction, a long leading sector, continues to worsen.

The news was “less dismal” in manufacturing construction spending, which rose for a change, up 0.2% for the month, but remains down -19.2% YoY and about 30% from its September 2024 peak. The “relatively” good news is that this number has been running almost completely flat for the last three months, and is only down -0.6% since June:

Both residential and manufacturing construction remain recessionary, plain and simple.

Finally, nonresidential construction, which includes but is by no means limited to AI data center related construction, continued to rise, up 1.1% for the month, and up 1.8% YoY:

But this is misleading. While unfortunately I can’t show you a graph, while total nonresidential construction spending nominally increased $7.647 Billion for the month, and $17.406 Billion YoY, but AI data center related construction spending rose by more, up 8.282 Billion for the month, and up $45.752 Billion YoY. In other words, take out the AI data center Boom and nonresidential construction is continuing to decline as well.

My conclusion this month is the same as it was last month: “Basically the goods-producing sector of the US economy includes the AI Boom, which is continuing, and everything else, which is somewhere between outright recessionary to slightly expanding. And the expansion is very inflationary.”

Weekly Indicators for October 26 - 30 at Seeking Alpha

 

 - by New Deal democrat

My “Weekly Indicators” post is up at Seeking Alpha.

The long leading indicators have been trending towards neutral at last since the start of the Iran conflict. But what is new over the last few weeks i that the short leading indicators are also beginning to trend in that direction. They’re still positive, but less so than even a month or two ago - although two components, stock prices and jobless claims, as I’ve been documenting here weekly, are still very positive.

As usual, clicking over and reading will bring you up to the virtual moment as to the state of the economy, and reward me with a penny or two for my efforts.

A mixed bag of long leading indicators in the Q3 GDP

 

 - by New Deal democrat

As promised, here is my look at yesterday’s GDP report - which importantly was supplemented by this morning’s report of the employment cost index for Q3. More on that below.

Since my emphasis is on forecasting rather than dissecting the entrails of the recent past, I don’t have much to say about the contributions of inventories, imports and exports. For my one and only “nowcast” graph, here is the quarterly change in real GDP (blue), compared with “core” GDP, a/k/a real final sales to domestic purchasers (red):

These are pretty good numbers, unsurprising for an inflationary expansion.

But since there are two items in the GDP report that constitute long leading indicators, real private residential investment, a proxy for housing, and proprietors’ income, a placeholder for corporate profits which won’t be reported until next month, let’s take a look at each of them along with one other long leading indicators, real retail sales per capita.

First: real private residential investment as a share of GDP tends to peak about 7 quarters before the onset of a recession. Below is the 30 year history of real private residential investment:

Since investment declined slightly, I don’t even have to deflate by GDP, which increased. The point is, the housing component of GDP is a negative. Which, by the way, is consistent with what we are seeing with the other (and best) long leading indicator of housing, single family permits:

Second: corporate profits deflated by unit labor costs are also a long leading indicator. Because they don’t get reported until the second estimate of GDP next month, I use proprietors’ income, which typically tracks corporate profits sometimes with a one quarter delay, until then. Nominally these rose 0.9% in the quarter:

Now let’s turn to the deflator in this series, unit labor costs, which were reported this morning to have risen 0.8% in Q3. Significantly, the wage component rose 0.7%, while the benefits component (think in particular medical benefits) rose 0.9%:

On a YoY basis, unit labor costs were up 3.4%. But wages only increased 3.1%, while benefits rose 3.9%:

You can thank the Big Bad Billionaire Bust-out Bill for that.

All of which means that after adjustment, proprietors’ income rose only 0.1% in Q3:

While certainly not a downturn, this suggests growth in profits may be stalling.

Finally, financial indicators of interest rates and money supply dominate the long leading indicators. But along with the two discussed above, the other “real economy” long leading indicator is real retail sales per capita. And unlike profits and housing, these have been on a pronounced upturn, although in September they only rose 0.1%:

The past 15 years have been potent evidence that these three “real economy” indicators need to turn down; relying on the financial indicators alone is not sufficient. So to recap: housing in Q3 was negative, profits in Q3 were flat to slightly positive, while consumption per capita was soundly positive.

This is a mixed bag which is not consistent with a downturn in the next few quarters, although it does suggest the economy will have no more than a moderate expansion in real terms for at least the first half of 2027.