Tuesday, August 14, 2007

More On Sentinel's Halting of Redemptions

From Bloomberg:

Sentinel Management Group Inc., the Illinois-based firm that manages $1.6 billion, said it asked regulators for permission to freeze client withdrawals because credit-market turmoil made it impossible to trade.

....

Sentinel invests for clients such as managed-futures funds, high-net-worth individuals and hedge funds that want to be able to withdrawal their cash quickly. Its investments include short- term commercial paper, foreign currency, investment-grade bonds and Treasury notes, according to its Web site.

.....

``Investor fear has overtaken reason and has induced a period in which most securities have simply ceased to trade,'' according to the client letter, which does not specify which funds are affected. ``We are concerned that we cannot meet any significant redemption requests without selling securities at deep discounts to their fair value and therefore causing unnecessary losses to our clients.''


From Sentinal's Website:

» Sentinel is a pioneer in the field. Since 1979, our success has been the result of managing clients' cash with utmost safety, daily liquidity and a high rate of return. Throughout our history, no client has suffered a loss as a result of its dealings with Sentinel.

» Sentinel is recognized by clients and peers for its professionalism and performance.

» Sentinel is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our stewardship of client funds is overseen by multiple federal and industry regulators.

» We provide our clients with liquidity and operational ease. Funds can be added or withdrawn as late in the day as 4pm, Eastern time. A complete report of activity and value is provided daily.


They have three funds.

Treasuries Only Portfolio

» Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds
» Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) obligations
» Repurchase Agreements collateralized by the above instruments


123 Portfolio

» Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and GNMA
» Short term commercial paper rated A1/P1
» Medium and long term debt rated AA or higher
» Bank time deposits
» Repurchase agreements collateralized by the above


They also have a prime fund which is currently off-line.

From what I am seeing, I don't see any major problems; this looks like solid conservative money-management to me. According to CBS Marketwatch:

Sentinel Management Group Inc., a firm that manages cash for other investors, has moved to halt client redemptions to avoid selling securities at deep discounts.

Sentinel told clients in a letter that it has asked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for permission to halt withdrawals.

A liquidity crisis in credit markets has made it "virtually impossible" to properly price and trade securities, leaving highly rated debt trading like junk bonds, Sentinel explained in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by MarketWatch.

"We are concerned that we cannot meet any significant redemption requests without selling securities at deep discounts to their fair value and therefore causing unnecessary losses to our clients," Sentinel said. "We contacted the CFTC today and asked for their permission to halt redemptions until we can honor them in an orderly fashion."

.......

However, Sentinel invested some of its clients cash in debt that had longer maturities. The weighted average maturity of the firm's prime portfolio was 396 months at the end of June, according to its Web site. The longer the maturity, the greater the potential risk.


Let's assume there aren't any off-balance sheet transactions or other accounting funny-business (and there is no reason to think so at this point). Sentinel is saying the market for even solid, high-quality paper is literally frozen right now, that Sentinel can't get a decent bid (offer to purchase) on large amounts of high-quality paper. Assuming that to be true, then the markets have a real problem.

The length of Sentinel's portfolio might be an issue right now, but again assuming they have stayed with their goal of only buying high-quality paper it still seems they should be able to get a decent bid.

I want to add with emphasis, there is no reason to think Sentinel has in any way violated its stated goal of managing funds in a very conservative manner. However, it's also a bit difficult to believe that no one is offering good prices on decent corporate and government paper right now. I'm not saying it can't happen, just that it would indicate a severe constriction in the debt markets.

This situation appears to be a riddle at this point. I'll keep an eye on this situation as it continues.

4 comments:

Robert D Feinman said...

My personal barometer is a collection of preferred stocks from blue chip companies. Many of the $25 par value stocks are now selling in the $20-22 range. This gives them an effective yield of about 9%

I think this can mean one of two things:
1. Income investors are expecting higher inflation in the near term and have pushed the stocks down in anticipation.
2. The need to cover shaky investments has made those holding higher grade instruments sell. Forced selling at a 10-20% loss to cover a margin call is better than being sold out at a 50+% loss.

If it's #1 (which I've been predicting since the wars started) then we are probably in for an extended period of stagflation as in the 1970's. LBJ's guns and butter policies have been perfectly replicated this time as well.

If it's #2 (which seems to be Warren Buffet's opinion) than those buying when everyone else is selling are going to seem like genius when the panic or squeeze ends.

mark said...

Well, as of 6:41PM central time, they've taken their website off-line. Personally, I'm finding it difficult to believe that everything is on the up-and-up with these guys.

I suppose it's possible that as a small shop, they couldn't handle the international scrutiny, but seems odd to pull the entire site offline...

phillies said...

The Bloomberg article has been updated. The sentence "Regulators said the firm never made such a request." seems a bit odd. The sentence in which the regulators appear to be saying that they have no authority to act on the request seemed odder. Perhaps Wednesday will be clearer.

One might propose that the Fed tends to overcorrect, and a more heavily damped policy would be more effective.

Anonymous said...

Liz Rappaport at thestreet.com observes

Financial institutions and money market funds that are exposed to so-called low risk, short-term debt that's collateralized by mortgage-backed securities may be in jeopardy.

So far, the problems with short-term debt, called asset-backed commercial paper, are reportedly limited to Sentinel Management Group, an Illinois-based money management firm, and Coventree, a Canadian company that organizes commercial paper sales for companies seeking the short-term financing.



Collateralized by mortgage-backed securities!!!! WTF????