First, let's look at how Fannie Mae is doing:
Fannie's $3.56 billion quarterly loss contrasts with a profit of $604 million in the same period a year earlier. The loss was equivalent to $3.80 a share, and compared with a profit of 49 cents a share a year earlier. Thomson Financial said Wall Street analysts had expected the company to lose $1.24 a share in the latest period.
"We are working through the toughest housing and mortgage markets in a generation," the company's president and CEO, Daniel Mudd, said in a statement. He said the company's losses reflected "the significant decline in home prices in a number of large regional markets and the growing number of borrowers struggling with their mortgages."
Mudd called 2008 "another tough year."
They lost a ton of money. So -- here's a great idea -- let's let them increase the amount of risk they can take on!
The regulator for mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said Wednesday it would lift a cap on the two companies' investment portfolios on March 1.
The announcement from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight came just hours after Fannie Mae was able to successfully file its 2007 financial statements on time Wednesday morning. Freddie Mac is expected to report its full-year 2007 results Thursday.
Shares of both Fannie and Freddie surged on the news. In late morning trading, Fannie shares were up $3.14, or 12%, to $30.11, while Freddie was up $2.14, or 8.5%, to $27.35, both on the New York Stock Exchange.
The inability of both firms to file their audited financial statements in a timely fashion was one of the major reasons Ofheo had placed a cap on the companies' retained mortgage portfolios. Now that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are able to successfully file on time, the caps are no longer necessary, Ofheo Director James Lockhart said in a statement.
Ladies and gentlemen -- the financial markets are frozen right now and for a damn good reason. Over the last 7 years -- and especially over the last 3 years or so -- a ton of bad loans were made. They were dressed up in complicated structures that were supposed to mitigate risk, but that didn't work. As a result every major financial player -- every bank, insurance company, brokerage firm etc.. -- has come out and said "we have a ton of bad loans on our books that aren't worth as much as we thought." This means there is a strong fear of default, meaning every lender on the planet is concerned that every borrower is in a fact a default risk. That's why the credit markets have frozen. And they should be frozen right now. That's the price you pay when you let really stupid policies run rampant in the economy.
But now the government is going to let two quasi-public institutions -- both of whom are having financial problems -- start buying more loans. Brilliant. And when it becomes obvious that Freddie and Fannie are losing more money, guess who will provide the bail-out? You and me.


5 comments:
Phew! I'm glad to see I wasn't the only person who noticed that it seemed illogical to raise the caps on Fannie after they had lost so much money without them. That Fannies shares went up with their ability to lose more money is also a bit baffling.
I was wondering what your take on this news is:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/27/news/economy/bernanke_house/index.htm?cnn=yes
If inflation (or as this article describes inflation: high prices of commodities and oil and the diminishing value of the dollar) is Bernake's worry why would he continue to cut rates at all? Every time he cuts rates the cost of commodities adjusts higher and the dollar drops in value. If he really wants to strengthen the dollar and avoid inflation shouldn't rates move the other way? I'm so confused. This site is one of the few places where things make at least some sense in today's crazy market. Keep up the good work!
The Market is on crack right now. There is so much wishful thinking going on, rallying on the slightest bit of evidence.
Can someone explain how the market has gained several hundred points so far this week. The economic news on both Tuesday and Wednesday was basically terrible. Yet the market is up about 170 pts.
it can make one wonder how much of all this is worth it, and help understand why some people just prefer a piece of land they can live on, paid for
the openness with which we the regular taxpayer are getting taken seems even more ominous
Every week billions of 401K dollars are pumped from paychecks into the stock market. This inflow of funds is on auto pilot. Investors have no idea what they are really investing in. I think that is one of the main reasons we haven't seen the market reflect the reality of the economic situation yet. How long this will last is uncertain. But every Ponzi scheme eventually collapses.
why is it that the same financial actors that go on and on about the need for free markets and the need to be rewarded for the potential risks they are taking, suddenly cry and scream for government help, when those risks are realized. If I, an individual, were to lose a bunch on the stock market, the general opinion would be "you knew the risk, you have to bear the result of your decision", but when large banks screw up and lose billions (ignoring the corruption aspect, where some loan salesmen made tons in commisions), they expect the taxpayers to help them out. Some so called free marketers don't seem to believe in the free market
Post a Comment