Above is a weekly chart for oil. It shows that oil peaked around $80/bbl in August and has been coming down in price since then. At the beginning of October oil went into a trading range between roughly $60 and $64. Anytime you see any security, commodity, future, whatever in a trading range, it indicates supply and demand are near equal. Traders think these prices are more or less fair for oil. Nothing has happened that would alter that fundamental perception.
What makes this interesting is OPEC announced production cuts this fall. There have been several news stories that OPEC is considering another production cut as well. However, this news hasn’t been enough to move oil higher. There are two reasons for this. First, OPEC is notoriously undisciplined – member states have routinely broken previous production quotas. Secondly, the US economy is slowing indicating US demand for oil may decrease. Therefore, prices of $80/bbl are unwarranted given the current US economic situation. Starting at the beginning of November, you see oil form a reverse head and shoulders formation. This could indicate the end of the trading pattern for oil. However, as with all technical analysis, it’s important to look at the fundamental situation to see if that makes sense (we’ll get to that in a minute).
Now, let’s go to a longer chart, this one with weekly bars.
There are two ways to look at this chart. The first is as a decline starting just after July, with a reaction move (or an upward rally) starting four bars from the right. Or, you can look at the formation starting in October as a rounding bottom of the downtrend that started in late July. Either interpretation indicates something new is probably about to happen.
However, the fundamentals don’t provide a strong signal either way. According to the latest This Week in Petroleum from the Department of Energy overall crude oil stocks are far above the average range. In addition, we have this:
The first major cold front of winter crossed much of the country last week, beginning with snow in Seattle during Monday Night Football, continuing with several inches of snow in parts of the Midwest by Thursday, and followed by cold, windy weather along the East Coast this past weekend and the first part of this week. In much of the country, anyone walking their dog at night, recently, understands that winter has arrived. And, as predicted, higher oil prices have arrived with the colder weather.
Colder weather is a net positive for the market, as it means winter fuel needs will increase. In addition, distillate stockpiles are decreasing, lowering overall supply.
The US has large stockpiles of oil and its economy is slowing. This is net oil negative. However, we have the cold front which is net oil positive. So, we come up with the following guesstimate:
A roughly 10% chance of oil dropping below $60. The market has had plenty of reasons to drop the price further – OPEC, a slowing US economy and consistent US stockpiles – and hasn’t. Clearly, $60/bbl provides strong support for the current background. It will probably take a change in the overall economic picture to lower prices below $60/bbl.
Chance of remaining in the current range – 45%. The market has also had good reason to drive the price up – again the OPEC production cut and the current cold front --- but hasn’t. Clearly, traders like the current range.
Chance of breaking trend – 45%. There are myriad reasons for a break above the current levels. Weather is one. Traders looking at the chart and seeing the upside down head and shoulders formation and buying on that is another.
Here is the one thing to take away from this: technical analysis is not an exact science. You can get a feel for the general direction of the market. But, the market will always do its very best to humble you at every turn.




35 comments:
Congrats on starting your own blog, got you bookmarked.
2007 is going to be an interesting year economy-wise.
Yes it is.
Any thoughts on the potential effects of some of the petroleum-producing countries banding together for peaceful nuclear production? BIG question for early in the am, I know...
Nice bloggy-woggy! Will put you in the ol' sidebar over at Mercury Rising.
A minor question: what's the fille and unfilled bars in those whisker plots? Volumes above/below average (mean or median)?
Hells yeah! Your D-kos diaries are some of the best! You sooooo needed your own blog. Got you bookmarked and linked to my own blog. Thanks for starting your own blog!
Your new blog is exactly the type of development I've been hoping for. Sites like DailyKos have gotten too big for good dialogs to take place. What happens instead is a form of cheering for the home team boosterism.
The rapid rolling of diaries off the list also runs counter to discussions which need time to develop.
A couple of others you might consider inviting (or at least linking to) include
Nathan Newman for unions
and Jerome a Paris for energy issues.
Congrats Bonddad. I've added you to my go-to list with Barry Ritholz, Calc Risk, Mish, TMTGM, Angry Bear and the others. You'll be good company for them!
I'm a longtime reader of your posts at kos, but I'm not a registered commenter there so I've been lurking in the shadows.
I'll no doubt make a pest of myself here. :-)
SF --
I'm flattered to be included in such fine company. All the econ bloggers you mention are on my list as well.
Looking forward to more on housing and unions. Rock on.
Bonddad, I cannot see your charts and graphs - either here or on Kos. This drives me crazy because I am a chart and graph type of person. I can see everyone elses?
What am I doing wrong?
I will check in later to find out the answer.
illyia
thank you, bonddad! i am thrilled to find you've done this - you are bookmarked!
question for you... any idea why the rapid climb in oil prices here in ca?
we've risen almost twenty cents in the last two weeks. is this trend going nationwide or is it just us getting kicked in the teeth. was fascinated to see your chart showing decline (if i spedread it correctly... eyes are blurry at the moment.
again, congrats on a move long overdue!
edrie
Bondad;
What would these charts look like in constant dollars? In other words, how much of the variance between 2005 and 2006 is a result of the dollar's lost value in that period?
edrie;
Prices here in Westchester County, NY, have also risen twenty cents since the election.
Note what I use as a time marker.
Not to be a nerd here. But West Coast cold weather shouldn't effect the oil market. The Northeast consumes the vast majority of heating oil in the US. Not sure what Seattlites burn, Granola maybe, but it's not heating oil.
edrie --
I can't comment on the California market -- I'm not well acquainted with it.
tbetz-
I don't know that either. However, inflation has been pretty low by historical standards for the last 5 years, so I don't think the chart would change that much.
Hey bonddad...congrats on your new blog, and I'll be a regular visitor here, I can assure you.
(darthstar)
Weather forecast for the next two weeks, all:
Warmer than normal most places, especially east of the Rockies. I'm wondering how much of THAT is being factored into the oil price we're seeing here? I know for a fact that medium-range forecasters are indeed employed by utility companies ... and that would either affect purchase contracts on that time scale or oil/gas companies may also employ them as well to get something of a "heads-up" on demand.
Congratulations on your new blog. A few questions:
What are your credentials? Publish your CV, please.
Are you a glass is half full or empty economist?
Socialist or captialist?
Objective or do you have a particular point of view you embrace, i.e. are you a Bush hater?
Good luck!
Credentials --
I'm a former bond trader.
I try to be a realist about the economy. For example, right now growth is good but it's financed with a mountain of debt which is deeply concerting.
Definitely a capitalist. However, I don't view government an an entirely bad thing. For example, securities markets require regulation etc...
Congratulations on branching out on your own. If you were a traded commodity, I'd buy quite a few contracts.
Great start, Bonddad! My uninformed opinion regarding the price of oil is this: it's going up! Well, in the long term, anyway, at least until we find something cheaper to replace it... :)
Oh, and on that topic, I read an interesting interview with T. Boone Pickens, Jr. (in Playboy, of all places...); of course, for him it's mostly dollars and cents, which is probably the only common ground I'd have with him anyhow.
Sheesh, one cold front's effect will wash out when we go to the warm SW flow that follows in a few days...
Welcome to the blog world Bonddad. The one area of weakness I have noticed in your dKos posts is energy/environment. Otherwise, great stuff.
The El Nino affected winter will be wet along the eastern seabord. I suspect that the north-east temperatures will fluctuate wildly, ending up near-normal for the winter as a whole. Check the NWS long range forecast.
Congratulations on your new blog! I have you bookmarked for future reference. All the Best.
Cronesense
Glad to see you started your own blog. I think you're the right man for this job.
Congratulations!
Thanks for starting your own blog on economic subjects and what's likely to be many related subjects. I'm really pleased.
Congratulations on your new blog. I've always found your posts on DKos fascinating, and I look forward to reading more of them, as well as other economic stuff, here.
I do have a question on this particular blog: I've always considered technical analysis to be akin to Voodoo, but that's based more on hunch than fact (which I guess is like my own Voodoo). You clearly believe in it. Is there some basic primer on it you could recommend which presents some actual data as to it's success rate compared, to, say, random chance?
FishOutofWater said... Sheesh, one cold front's effect will wash out when we go to the warm SW flow that follows in a few days...
How you look at that depends, of course, on where you stand on Peak Oil ... whether we are at it or just past, its coming in the medium term, or for extreme optimists it won't be here for twenty years.
If producers see selling below a certain price as a substantial foregone capital gain, that reinforces the floor when the trading range includes that price. And of course if that decision is based on revenue of exploiting the stock over exploitation cost, that leads to preferential depletion of the lower cost to exploit supplies.
A peak-oil pessimist would see moderate inward shifts in demand schedules as a steady-price scenario over the medium term, not a falling-price scenario over the medium term.
can you stand one more congratulatory note?
i'll be checking in regularly
wystler
The question I have when I look at oil prices is how a decline or steadying in prices squares with a lot of the peak oil concerns we saw early in the year. Conceptually peak oil makes sense to me, but yet we see an apparent supply glut, which you'd think to be unlikely if we're past the peak. Is this reflective of suppliers overproducing from their existing reserves that will lead to a supply drop down the line? Or are we seeing a genuine increase in production?
Oh and congrats on the new blog! :)
One thing that can lead to an oversupply despite peak oil is weakening world economies.
When the economy weaks oil demand drops, regardless of the ability or lack thereof to increase supply, which can lead to excess supply in the market
re: technical analysis
There are several books I would recommend
Anything by WD Gann.
Anything by Gartley
Anything by Schabacker.
All three of these authors wrote their original works in the 1930s. I have read a fair number of them. They don't propose to provide a magic bullet of any sort. Instead they basically say, "here are some things to look for. If they happen, there is a higher probability of X happening."
No brainer - this is the time to buy, as next summer will be the time to sell. PBR is a stock I've grown to love like a child these past 4 years or so, as by guaging the oil market correctly, you can bet on taking a profit, and if it doesn't work out right, to sell short, it's always a good choice to hold an oil stock as long as Bush and this war are still alive.
The chart indicates to me that for a month or so, the price will fluxuate around the average, and in late January things (your guess is as good as mine) will happen to get the price back up around 70.
Buy now...I'm not going anywhere, so we'll see if my credibility is worth anything...
But for novice traders out there (I fall into that category as well), do some research on state owned oil companies that trade within the US. Plot out their volume and closing prices alongside the commodity price for a barrell, and when you have a couple that stick with the chart very well, wait for a lull like we have right now and buy up some shares.
If anything, owning part of the machine will mean you're interested and educated in the future.
To windowdog and bonddad:
The west coast uses more natural gas for home heating.
redfish said... One thing that can lead to an oversupply despite peak oil is weakening world economies.
Yes. The point about peak oil is that over the medium term it implies a rising baseline price for any given level of demand, so price reductions are buffered and price rises amplified. It does not apply that the market turns into a one-way ratchet.
And what it does in the short term ... heck, I'm an obscure development economist. I don't do short term, as there are a lot of very clever people who do so better than I could.
But an expectation of a rising baseline feeds into decision of how rapidly to sell into a market with falling prices.
Post a Comment