Friday, August 20, 2010

A Note on the Leading Economic Indicators

- by New Deal democrat

As I have frequently pointed out, the KISS method to be right about the economy over the next 3-6 months is simply to follow the LEI. In the past it has been documented that you won't always be right, but you'll be right a lot more often than those who claim to engage in fundamental analysis" or simply rely on what other pundits say.

H/t to Briefing.com, here is the LEI for the last 24 months:

As you can see, they were already in steep decline in July 2008, two months before the "Black September" crash in the economy. They turned up in April 2009, 3 months before the economy as a whole bottomed. For the last four months, the best way to read them in terms of the immediate future is, converging on zero. Typically it is said that a decline in the LEI of three straight months signals a recession: we simply aren't there yet.

Additionally, here is a screenshot, again from briefing.com, of the reading of each indicator for the last 5 months:

Once again, you would be hard put to discern a trend in any one of those indicators. In any given month, a random member of the group is decisively up or down, and has not moved continuously from month to month. Again, what we see is, convergence on zero.

Finally, here is a graph (ending in early 2009) of a 6-month diffusion index of the indicators:

The point of this index is that, to signal recession or recovery, at least 8 or 9 of the 10 indicators should all be moving in the same direction. We are nowhere near that yet. So far, only 3 -- ISM vendor performance, building permits, and consumer expectations -- may be negative for 6 months. Stock market performance is on the edge. Initial claims may well have tipped as well, as of yesterday.

But that simply does not signal recession, rather than a slowdown, yet.

2 comments:

brodero said...

Tried to put together a scenario
for negative Real GDP in 3rd qtr...

This is in nominal terms ( I get a
headache trying to rap myself around real terms ....just stupid I guess)
Personal consumption increases
40 billion slightly lower than 43
Billion ( plus it is a real low 1.5% annualized spending rate even
though last quarters disposable income was up 4.4%)
Gross domestic investment increases 30 billion down from 110 billion last quarter
Government expenditires increase 20 billion down from 38 billion last quarter

Net exports (loss)continues to widen
40 billion (I have real hard time
with one..

Gdp deflator takes off 55 billion

A lot of moving parts to get
negative growth

Anonymous said...

There are a lot of people that seem to be jonesing for bad outcomes.