Saturday, September 8, 2007

Where The Market Stands

I have been working on the theory that the market was consolidating in a head and shoulders formation and was going to make a short rally as the rate cut expectations grew. Everything was about where I expected it to be through Friday morning. The market was still uneasy, but was consolidating gains and staying above the H&S neckline. The daily action wasn't great, but wasn't horrible

Then came the employment report. It wasn't just bad. It stunk. Mish completely takes it apart. He and I are in complete agreement on what this report said: This jobs report was nothing short of a disaster. In short, this wasn't just weak enough to add credence to a rate cut scenario. It increased talk of an outright recession. That is a development I wasn't expecting and that is the reason for the heavy action yesterday.

I will add in my own defense that I have consistently put up the NYSE and NASDAQ new highs/new lows chart from stockcharts.com and mentioned they indicate the uptrend isn't that strong (see this post). And I also mentioned the transportation average was not confirming the rally along with another mention of the weak high/low average here. This demonstrates that while I was short-term bullish I was still not completely sold on my own idea.

However, let's look at a broader idea I mentioned in this article -- that the idea of a rate cut has put a floor under the market.

Here's a daily chart of the SPYs:



As I mentioned below, yesterday's action did a great deal of technical damage. First, it broke the uptrend the market started in late July. Trends are very important in the market. Traders will follow them irrespective of the underlying market conditions. If the market is moving in one direction, traders will simply stare at their screens, block out any contrary information, and keep making bets in the trends direction. That's how market work. Yesterday's action ruined a few weeks long trend.

In addition, it took out the theory of the market consolidating in a head and shoulders formation and rallying on rate cut events. With yesterday's close breaking the neck line the possibility of a higher move are greatly diminished.

All that being said -- what is the downside risk right now? First, there is a ton of technical traffic in the $144-$148 area. The market has to move through this area convincingly before another serious downside move. There is also the issue of the 200 day SMA, which has acted like a center of gravity for the market for the last month. While the market hasn't moved convincingly higher over the 200 day SMA, it has not moved convincingly lower either. That tells me the jury is definitely still out regrading the downside risk. Then there is the issue of overall valuation. According to Barron's The Dow's PE is 15.73 and the S&P's is 17.08. While these aren't cheap, they certainly aren't expensive either. In other words, traders aren't going to sell based on the theory the market is really expensive.

Then there is the Fed. The market is expecting a rate cut in September, and the jobs report adds a great deal of credence to that expectation. I would add a word of caution that last week four Fed governors gave speeches that did not telegraph a 100% possibility of a rate cut. I work on the assumption that Fed officials have advanced economic information, meaning they probably knew about the jobs report when they gave their speeches. However, despite these speeches, I would not be surprised to see the Fed cut rates later this month.

However, I think the market is now moving into a different thought pattern. The jobs report increased talk of a recession. And the market may now be really on edge as it awaits more data that either confirms or denies that possibility. Until there is a firm idea as to which way the underlying economy is going I would expect the market to remain very weak, but not weak enough to send the market into a complete meltdown. Therefore, I think the market is going to move back into a very neutral stance where the 200 day SMA is the big trendline to watch.

Now that I've said that, I'm sure the market will again make an ass out og me within the next few weeks.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

My post yesterday was not meant as criticism. It was an honest question about the bearish response (equity sell off) to a traditionally bullish sentiment (inevitable rate cut). And it's just one of the things confusing me about the markets recently.

Example: I always thought the market moved inversely to oil, but for several days both oil prices and the equity market were going up. Perhaps yesterdays sell-off was a return to the norm, at least regards oil prices?

Example: the recent months of decline in the value of the dollar were accompanied by a general rise in the equity markets... until yesterday - the first time in a while (that I can remember) where the dollar did not strengthen as stocks were sold. Does this(ultimately) reflect the dollar losing some of it pimacy as a global currency? [At any rate, it's clear to me that our leaders are more than willing to sacrifice the dollar, which worries me, a "cash is king" saver, greatly].

Finally - Floyd Norris offers charts, in today's NYTimes, which clarify the negative effect inflation has on real market value: adjusted for inflation, the markets have failed this decade. Why doesn't this matter more?

PS - don't even get me started on my confusion about bonds. Sorry, but I will never "get" the bond market. Is there an easy explanation about how it works that I'm missing?

Anonymous said...

market isn't expensive?

I don't know -- don't they always use forward p/e's now.

As the tsunami gets closer -- I assume forward earnings for a lot of companies, financial, retail, energy, housing, etc. to contract faster than current expectations. Real p/e ratios may be around 25-30 when they start reporting next year.

So a 50% haircut on the SPYs is not out of the question. The only thing keeping stocks up is denial. And that kind of hope fades fast.

Anonymous said...

Any notion about the relatively low market volume - low given the size of the drop?

bluestatedon said...

Bonddad, thanks for the link to Mish. His work confirms my longtime suspicion that the Bush's boys in the BLS (and lord knows what other Federal depts) have been manipulating and fudging the figures right along to mask the weakness in employment and other aspects of the economy down at the ground level. Eventually the awful reality will have to percolate up to the traditional media, and then the walls of denial will be breached as quickly as a US Army Corp of Engineers-approved levee in the Big Easy.

Anonymous said...

It would not surprise me since we have the worst president in the history of this country to now experience the worst depression this country has ever seen.

There is a price to pay for corruption, greed, ignorance, and stupidity. Eight years worth.

That won't be mitigated by any number of rate cuts.