Go read Fed's Yellen on Housing at Calculated Risk. It's at the top of the page. CR has done a great job with the housing market -- and this article will only solidify his reputation in that regard.
3 comments:
Theholyfatman
said...
Question for you: I was discussing the current state of the Economy with an employee of the US Treasury. he said that the Sec of The Treasury had given a big talk to all employees and the biggest concern was the ongoing discussions with China RE: devaluing their currency. The Teasury Sec doesn't see that happening within the next three years. However, China does understand that their economy is dependant on our consumerism and won't try to upset that delicate balance. I agree--somewhat But I'm not 100% confident that China won't move to blow our economy to hell and back. Your thoughts?
All of the parties are aware that a massive run on the dollar would destroy $1 trillion in dollars the Chinese hold at their central bank. That would cripple two countries.
Right now there is a currency game of chicken and Mutual assured destruction going on. Central banks around the globe want to diversify. But if they do it too quickly, they will hurt their own reserves. At the same time, our trading partners know that both sides of the international trade game can royally screw the other. The US can erect massive trade barriers while the Chinese can dump dollars. Because both of these moves would destroy both parties, neither will do it.
My tax practice is centered around captive insurance. I'm the author of the book U.S. Captive Insurance Law (which is also available on Kindle), the leading book in the field. You can learn more about captive insurance at my website.
I'm on Linked In and Twitter (@captivelawyer). Silver Oz's Linked In name is @silver_oz. NDD is a fossil and may be reached by etching a picture in stone on the wall of a cave.
The Bonddad Economic History Project
At the beginning of 2012, I decided to start looking at the actual, statistical history of the US economy starting in 1950. The reason is simple: to find out what really happened. So, when you see title of a post that begins with a year such as 1957, followed by "employment" or "Fed policy: you know what it's for. You can also access the information by typing in BE for Bonddad econ and a year to find information on a particular year.
Here is a link to pages that contain links to all the posts on the years listed.
This blog contains opinions and observations. It is not professional advice in any way, shape or form and should not be construed that way. In other words, buyer beware.
3 comments:
Question for you: I was discussing the current state of the Economy with an employee of the US Treasury. he said that the Sec of The Treasury had given a big talk to all employees and the biggest concern was the ongoing discussions with China RE: devaluing their currency. The Teasury Sec doesn't see that happening within the next three years. However, China does understand that their economy is dependant on our consumerism and won't try to upset that delicate balance. I agree--somewhat But I'm not 100% confident that China won't move to blow our economy to hell and back.
Your thoughts?
No US consumer -- no China exports. It's that simple.
Here's the non-smart ass answer.
All of the parties are aware that a massive run on the dollar would destroy $1 trillion in dollars the Chinese hold at their central bank. That would cripple two countries.
Right now there is a currency game of chicken and Mutual assured destruction going on. Central banks around the globe want to diversify. But if they do it too quickly, they will hurt their own reserves. At the same time, our trading partners know that both sides of the international trade game can royally screw the other. The US can erect massive trade barriers while the Chinese can dump dollars. Because both of these moves would destroy both parties, neither will do it.
Post a Comment