This is a continuation of my series reverse engineeering ECRI's Weekly Leading Index (WLI). I began by noting that ECRI's founder, Prof. Geoffrey Moore, in 1990 initially proposed a Weekly Leading Index made up of indicators whose values could be computed weekly, or if monthly were reported at the beginning of the next month. While this index would be a little less reliable than the Long Leading and Short Leading Indeces, it would have the advantage of being more timely.
Its weekly components were:
Real M2
Dow Jones Bond Average
S&P 500 stock price index
Initial claims for unemployment insurance
Journal of Commerce change in commodity prices
Dun and Bradstreet new business formation and large business failure
Real estate loans, deflated, growth rate
The quickly reported monthly components were:
Average workweek in manufacturing
Layoff rate under 5 weeks
ISM manufacturing vendor performance
ISM manufacturing inventory change
The questions remained, were the monthly components included in the final result? Were the weekly components weighted? Were there any changes in the list? As to the last, I have noted that it is almost impossible to generate a decline such as ECRI claims for the WLI in 2011 if Real M2, which experienced a tsunami-like increase in late summer, were still included. I have suggested that the credit spread between government and corporate bonds might have replaced Real M2 in the list at some point.
It appears that ECRI spokesman Lakshman Achuthan himself has all but settled the issue. Appearing as a guest author at Barry Ritholtz' "The Big Picture" blog in 2009, he wrote:
Our leading indexes are composites of key drivers of the business cycle. Correlations are not part of our process which focuses on the relationship of indicators around inflection points in growth and inflation. .... ECRI does not suggest that the LLI is a perfect leading indicator, but it does not include stock prices and has a longer lead than stock prices over growth rate cycle turns.(my emphasis) (UPDATE: To avoid confusion, please note that the reference to stocks not being included, is to ECRI's "long leading index," a completely separate index).
You can read more about the Weekly Leading Index (formerly known as the Business Week leading index) here: http://books.google.com/books?id=vSz99DDF-q8C&pg=PA107&dq=beating+the+business+cycle+weekly+leading+index&client=firefox-a
The link takes you to the book "Beating the Business Cycle," authored by Achuthan in 2004. There, at pp. 108-09 he says
"To monitor developments on a more frequent basis, Moore helped develop a Weekly Leading Index (WLI) in 1983. Some of the components of the WLI, like initial jobless claims, had long been available on a weekly basis. Others had to be created from scratch, like the Journal of Commerce-ECRI industrial materials price index, designed to measure inflation in a broad range of industrial raw materials. Starting in 1983, the weekly index was published in Business Week magazine. Known at the time as the Business Week Leading Index, ... In the late 1990s, ECRI began to publish the index through our own website, businesscycle.com.Then, at pp. 135-36 he elaborates:
"We .. determin[e] good proxy measures for the various drivers [of the economy] -- that is, individual leading indicators -- and combin[e] them into composite indeces which objectively summarize their information. For example, in constructing the Weekly Leading Index (WLI) , we use a specific leading indicator -- initial claims for unemployment insurance -- to represent employment, which is a key driver of the business cycle. Likewise, we pick out six other specific leading indicators that are updated weekly, to represent other cyclical forces. Because the seven indicators are rarely unanimous, we summarize them into the composite WLI ...."
(my emphasis)
Finally, a little google searching reveals that several issues of Business Week including the "Business Week Leading Index" are archived online. Here is a screenshot of one of them, edited only to delete a line describing another unrelated index. Note that it includes precisely seven indicators:

Another example can be found here.
So that just about settles it. The referenced "real estate loans" are sourced to the Federal Reserve Bank and weekly updates can be found here.
It appears that the index is weighted. Also, I continue to question whether Real M2 survived the transition, just as it appears that AAA bonds were substituted for the similar Dow Jones Bond Average. With those caveats, the components of the WLI are unmasked.


16 comments:
Your list includes stock prices, but the first quote says stock prices aren't used...
Andy: He is referring to a separate index, the "long leading index" which specifically does not include stock prices.
The Weekly Leading Index does. Hope that helps.
P.S. I've update the post in response to your comment. Thanks
I can estimate the weights if you have the data.
ECRI has several times used the phrase "contagion among our indicators" which I took to mean increased cross-correlations, but now I am not certain. Any comments if this means anything?
Great series of posts, by the way.
Rich
I used to find various links such as these suggesting that M2 was a part of the WLI composition:
http://www.haver.com/comment/comment.html?c=040823A.html
Perhaps they are looking at velocity of M2 now.
David Merkel: Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. I think others may already be doing this.
Anon: By contagion, they presumably mean that the LLI, the WLI, and the short leading indicators are all pointing in the same direction. They also have inflation, housing, employment and other indeces, and I believe they also make use of those in making forecasts.
RB: Thanks for the link to Haver. It's actually very similar. The only differences are that Dun and Bradstreet is dropped, both money supply and credit spreads are used, and Purchase Mortgages are substituted for real estate loan growth rate. I wonder what their source is.
The WLI is basically a marketing tool. I don't believe even ECRI takes it seriously in their recession calls.
I have all of the data except for the JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index and the D&B Failures Index, now called the D&B US Insolvency Index.
How certain is it that ECRI has changed, and now includes corporate bond spreads in addition to yields?
You can probably figure out the weights using a little matrix algebra and some reported changes in their outlook.
Better question is, why would you want to reverse engineer it? Are you sure it has any forecasting ability or merely a coincidental indicator?
I think reverse engineering it is important. If the WLI is shouting recession, then we need to know which components are responsible for this and then assess the risk accordingly. I suspect Industrial metals prices, corporate bond yields (or spreads) and stock prices were largely responsible for its recent plunge (although stocks are recovering) but it is a guess. If we had the weights we could assess this and it would be useful information.
I looked at the spread between 10-yr Treasuries and BAA corporate bonds and it seemed to explain the divergence between the ECRI and the LEI, etc.
If you think about it, the one striking event that has occurred over the last six months that could whack out an index like this is the European debt crisis. That has caused a rush into treasuries which has little to do with the state of our economy.
According to the source below, the spread was part of the index in 2004:
http://www.investingdaily.com/10969/how-to-profit-from-the-economic-slowdown-dead-ahead
Thanks for the bog!
The answer: http://alephblog.com/2012/01/18/on-predicting-the-future/
I often wonder why people are so interested in the WLI. I looked into this recently, and my interest was in reproducing the long and short leading indices which are central to ECRI's forecasting approach (as Lakshman Achuthan says in Beating the Business Cycle). The book does not say what the components are, but I found a lot of information about them and about the inflation leading index in three books: Analyzing Modern Business Cycles: Essays Honoring Geoffrey H. Moore -- Klein; Leading Indicators for the 1990's -- Moore; and Leading Economic Indicators: New Approaches and Forecasting Records -- Lahiri and Moore. I have pretty-much reproduced all three indices. I decided that the split into long and short leading indices was not actually that useful, and changed some components (M2 is now useless, for example) to create my own index.
I found my research on this subject to be an interesting introduction to the concept of a composite index. I have also reconstructed the Conference Board Leading Index as an exercise in understanding how to put one together. The approach has some advantages over linear regression modelling -- because the only parameters are the components to be included. For example, if you want to know what drives the S&P 500, try making a composite index using twelve-month trailing earnings and the BBB OAS.
I found a few websites that say that the WLI includes mortgage applications:
http://www.marketthoughts.com/z20020127.html
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/2002/01/01/315617/index.htm
http://www.stock-channel.net/stock-board/archive/index.php3/t-3893.html
http://www.philstockworld.com/2010/05/28/ecri-leading-indicators-dip-again-is-a-double-dip-recession-coming/
Post a Comment