Monday, December 20, 2010

Household Deleveraging Continues

- by New Deal democrat

The Federal Reserve's report on household debt burdens was released Friday, covering the July-September quarter. According to the bank,
The household debt service ratio (DSR) is an estimate of the ratio of debt payments to disposable personal income. Debt payments consist of the estimated required payments on outstanding mortgage and consumer debt.

The financial obligations ratio (FOR) adds automobile lease payments, rental payments on tenant-occupied property, homeowners' insurance, and property tax payments to the debt service ratio.
Both measures declined substantially again, although by not as much as the last few quarters. I've combined them into a single graph:



Debt service payments (blue line) are now less than most of the last 30 years. Total financial obligations (red line), are now less than all but the early 1980s and 1990s - i.e., less than more than 2/3's of the last thirty years.

If this rate of decline continues, then by 6 months from now, households will have lower debt burdens than at any time since the early 1980s - in other words, they will be at a 25 year low.

Recently, a few pundits have made the argument that households weren't actually cutting their debt at all, based on bank charge-offs and foreclosures.

This was addressed and appears to have been put to rest by the New York Federal Reserve. The bank's Quarterly Report on Debt and Credit for the third quarter of 2010 showed that
Since its peak in the third quarter of 2008, nearly $1 trillion has been shaved from outstanding consumer debts.

Additionally, this quarter’s supplemental report addresses for the first time the question of how this decline has been achieved and notes a sharp reversal in household cash flow from debt, indicating a decrease in available funds for consumption. According to newly available data through year end 2009, the payoff of debt by consumers reduced their cash flow by about $150 billion, whereas between 2000 and 2007, borrowing had contributed more than
$300 billion annually to consumers’ cash flow.

Excluding the effects of defaults and charge-offs, available data show that non-mortgage debt fell for the first time since at least 2000. Also, net mortgage debt paydowns, which began in 2008, reached nearly $140 billion by year end 2009. These unique findings suggest that consumers have been actively reducing their debts, and not just by defaulting.

“Consumer debt is declining but only part of the reduction is attributable to defaults and charge-offs,” said Donghoon Lee, senior economist in the Research and Statistics Group at the New York Fed. “Americans are borrowing less and paying off more debt than in the recent past.
The seemingly conflicting data on the relatively modest decline of overall debt, vs. the steep decline in financial obligations, is explained in large part by refinancing. Here is a graph, courtesy of Mortgage News Daily, of the volume of refinancing measured weekly in the past 2 1/2 years:



There was a surge of refinancing as mortgage rates fell to 4%. Somebody who, for example, had a 6% mortgage, and refinanced at 4%, instantly lowered their mortgage payment by 1/3 - even though the overall debt remained the same. Furthermore, it appears that about 1/3 of all mortgage refinancings during the third quarter included additional paydowns of mortgage balances as well.

When people wonder how we can have both increased saving, and increased spending, this is the answer.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

As far as I'm concerned this can only be a good thing for the future even if it hurts some now.

Anonymous said...

Well wonder no more...

Although one must wonder how the aggregated consumers' new found faith in having more savings and less debt taken together with the Bush tax cut extensions will affect the economy moving forward when the austerity minded Republican majority arrives at the House? Even though the economy is currently showing a few signs of life, sans the stimuli from the consumer and government the Great Recession continues...

George Phillies said...

Modest math retuning perhaps suggested: "Somebody who, for example, had a 6% mortgage, and refinanced at 4%, instantly lowered their mortgage payment by 1/3 - even though the overall debt remained the same."

The change lowers the interest portion of the payoff by 1/3. Payments of principal remain unchanged.

There is the further complication that mortgages are most readily available at 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30- year lengths, and someone with, say, 17 years left might have taken a 20-, or a 15-year term.

Mind you, I refinanced, and my payments went up; I also shortened the remaining term.

Also, the inverse of 'deductibility of interest from income for taxes" is 'less interest means less refund', so if the payment did not change, the taxpayers taxes paid went up.

revgerry said...

Thank you, President Obama and Congress, for including refinancing in the 2009 Stimulus Bill. I will have my house paid off 10 years earlier than I ever imagined, and when inflation becomes a problem later on, my fixed income will stretch to meet expenses.