Friday, September 3, 2010

Mish has lost all credibility re State Sales Tax Receipts

- by New Deal democrat

I last blogged about Mish's accidental bottom ticking in early July, saying that The Emperor of Doom wears no Clothes, shredding his claim that retail sales gains were a mirage because, allegedly, state sales tax returns were still declining. Here's what he said then:
Month in and month out we hear the same nonsense about retail sales. I will believe it when I see state sales tax collections support the claims.
....
states have been reporting declining sales tax collections for the entire year.
Unfortunately for Mish's claim, checking state sales tax collection reports showed that in the second quarter almost all of them were increasing!

In rebuttal to a comment our reader Constant Learner attempted to leave on his blog, Mish cited an article from July 2009 w/r/t tax increases in many states that rose earlier in 2009. Any of those increases already in effect in May 2009 are equally applicable to both years and support the data I cited. He also cited a California article that references the many tax increases that took place beginning in April 2009. Again these are applicable to both years and so support my point.

Well, as Bonddad reported earlier this week, the Rockefeller Institute came out with its initial report on second quarter state revenues. Mish duly quoted them as follows (my emphasis):

Sales tax collections increased by 5.9 percent in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter of 2009, but were still 5.4 percent lower than two years ago. With 42 of 45 sales-tax states reporting so far, only seven states reported declines in sales tax collections compared with the same quarter last year.
To which Mish replied (without any reference to supporting data):
Much of the improvement in sales taxes is a result of tax hikes, not increased sales. Those effects will soon wear off in year-over-year comparisons
Note btw that Mish doesn't say tax increases are responsible for all of the improvement, just an undefined "much" of it.
So let's review:

1. Mish says that "I will believe [increases in retail sales data] when I see state sales tax collections support the claims."
2. The Rockefeller Institute reports that sales tax collections increased.
3. Mish discounts the Rockefeller Institute report, without citation to contrary data.

Mish has lost all credibility when it comes to state sales tax receipts.

And by the way, contrary to his last sentence, July state sales tax receipts don't help him out either. Here they are:

New York:
sales tax receipts up 7.7%
total tax receipts up 6.8%

Indiana
Indiana up 10% YoY in June

Texas:
Texas up 7.6% YoY

Tennessee"
Tennessee July up 5.94% YoY

Alabama
Alabama up 1.31%

Georgia:
Georgia up 2.4%
4.7% total tax revenues

California:
Calif up 1.2% YoY June (UPDATE: July up almost 20%)

Florida:
FL up 2.6% YoY in July

Ohio:
Ohio up 9.6% in July

New Jersey's data was unavailable.

Since both of the articles Mish cited two months ago dealt with tax increases that predated the second half of 2009, they don't apply, as previous tax hikes wouldn't affect YoY July numbers. I eagerly await Mish's attempt to discover tax hikes in those states that occurred after last July.

6 comments:

brodero said...

Mish is married to his position...
as we used to say in trading...he is wearing a tasteful wedding dress...

Anonymous said...

Looking at the California report, it says total receipts (not sales tax receipts, but total receipts) for June were down YoY, at around $11.5 million. But looking at the report for July it says monthly receipts were $4.8 million, which was actually slightly up year over year. In July 2009 and July 2010, receipts were about $11-12 million, but in July 2009 and July 2010, receipts were about $5 million.

At first I thought this might have something to do with the end of the fiscal year, but then I realized that Sales and Use Taxes were about $1.5 million higher in June than July in both years. What gives? Why is June so much higher than July in tax collections?

Anonymous said...

As someone already noted, sales tax receipts in California were down yoy. Florida was 1.4% higher.

Ohio,

Personal consumption expenditures.. yoy change consumption slowed from
4.0% in March to 3.1% in June. After adjustment for inflation, consumption was up only 1.7%
from a year earlier. Weakness was broad-based in June, as spending on durable goods,
nondurable goods and services increased modestly or declined during the month.

Much of the gain in sales tax revenues has been from the increase in the price of gasoline. GAs station revenue per the official census.gov site for retail sales was up 12.2% yoy. That's significant. Also, a large number of states increased tobacco taxes.

May 19, 2010|By Nicholas Riccardi, Los Angeles Times
Reporting from Phoenix — Voters in this famously tax-averse state Tuesday night approved a temporary hike in the sales tax to stave off brutal budget cuts, handing Gov. Jan Brewer a crucial victory.

May 12, 2010
GOP-fueled sales tax increase boosts Kansas near top 10

increase.html#ixzz0yVgAcwPj

Anonymous said...

Five percent tax increase for Illinois
Updated: Tuesday, 01 Sep 2009, 6:11 PM EDT

Amanda Jarrett
MARSHALL, Ill. (WTHI) - Shopping will now cost you more in Illinois. Sales tax has skyrocketed from one percent to more than 6 percent on certain items.

Grabbing a candy bar or even shopping in the shampoo aisle in Illinois is going to cost you more. The sales tax on candy, alcohol, soda and toiletries will now be 6.25 percent instead of the previous 1 percent.
_____

Effective July 1, 2010, the 0.25% local food and beverage tax will be increased to 0.5%. This increase is a result of the Wisconsin Center District exercising its authority to increase the rate, as provided in sec. 77.981, Wis. Stats., (2007-08), as amended effective October 1, 2009 by 2009 Wis. Act 2.

Prior to October 1, 2009, sales of soft drinks sold in cans or bottles for off-premises consumption were not subject to the local food and beverage tax. Effective October 1, 2009, sales of soft drinks are subject to the local food and beverage tax, regardless of whether the soft drinks are sold from a dispenser, or sold in cans or bottles, and regardless of whether sold for consumption on or off the seller’s premises.

Anonymous said...

Washington State passes sweeping tax package

SIN TAXES
Cigarette and tobacco tax increase. A tax of $1 per pack of cigarettes has been added.
Tax increase on carbonated beverages. Soda and such are taxed at 2 cents per 12 ounces. The bottler is exempt from the tax on the first $10 million sold. Tax is in effect from July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2013.
Sales tax on candy and gum. Candy and gum are subject to sales tax effective June 1, 2010.
Temporary sales tax on bottled water. From June 1, 2010, to June 20, 2013, sales tax applies to bottled water.
Beer excise tax. The excise tax on beer is increased from 26 cents to 76 cents per gallon. Microbreweries are exempt on the first 60,000 gallons sold.

New Deal democrat said...

Anon at 5:55:

I'm sorry, but you are incorrect about California. The earlier commenter referenced TOTAL receipts, not sales tax receipts. If you go to page A2 of the report, about the fifth line down for each month, you will read the following for June and July, which I have copied and parted. The first figure is 2010, the second for 2009:

Retail Sales and Use Taxes 2,515,865 2,486,729
Retail Sales and Use Taxes 1,073,300 888,314

I do appreciate your citation to the Arizona article, but of course that's not one of the states I've been following, and I don't know if it has kicked in yet. If I can find revenue figures for Arizona online, I'll supplement the above entry.

PCE's don't really reply to me so much as Bonddad I think, but certainly June was in the teeth of the post-April slowdown.

(Note to previous Anon at 4:02 - tax receipts are notoriously seasonal, and vary with quarter endings, etc., which is why there is no choice but to measure them YoY rather than MoM).