- by New Deal democrat
I'm changing my presentation of JOLTS data somewhat compared with the last year or two. At this point I've pretty much beaten the dead horses of (1) "job openings" are soft and unreliable data, and should be ignored in contrast with the hard "hires" series; and (2) the overall trend is that of late expansion but no imminent downturn.
So let's start a little differently, by comparing nonfarm payrolls from the jobs report with what should theoretically be identical data: total hires minus total separations in the JOTLS report, monthly (first graph) and quarterly (second graph):
While there can be a considerable disparity in any one month, once we start looking longer term there is an incredibly tight fit.
For our immediate purposes, it's likely that the strength in the JOLTS hiring data over the last several months is the same trend as the very good post-hurricane October and November jobs reports, both of which showed that more than 200,000 jobs had been added. While any given month can be off significantly, it's a fair bet that when the December JOLTS report is released in one month, it too will be weaker, just as was the December jobs report.
Next, my mantra is that hiring leadis firing, so that part of the presentation is still important. To reeiterate, the major shortcoming of this report is that it has only covered one full business cycle. In that cycle, in acord with my mantra, hires peaked and troughed before separations:
Just as at the bottom of the Great Recession, at the end of the "shallow industrial recession" of 2015, hiring (red) troughed first, followed later in 2016 by separations (blue). With hiring up, I expect the level of separations to also increase (note some of these are voluntary) in the next few months as well.
Further, in the previous cycle, after hires stagnated, shortly thereafter involuntary separations began to rise, even as quits continued to rise for a short period of time as well:
[Note: above graphs show quarterly data to smooth out noise]
Here are hires vs. separations on a monthly basis for the last 24 months:
While quits remain at expansionary high levels, they seem to have stagnated in the last 6 months. With hiring increasing again, if the pattern from the last decade holds, I would expect quits to improve somewhat as well.
Meanwhile the good news is that involuntary separations have fallen in the last several months, even if we average the last two. At the same time, they remain above thei bottom they established a year ago:
Once again the report yesterday was a good one, mirroring November's jobs report, but on the other hand, it is very consistent with being late in the cycle. Since hiring leads firing, what I am looking for next is at what point dies hiring stagnate, and will it be confirmed by continued stagnation in quites?