- by New Deal democrat
With few exceptions, people don't get a job for social reasons. They go to work each day in order to earn money to purchase necessities, discretionary goods, and to save for future needs. In short, they work because of cold, hard cash.
That's why I think the defining element of a labor market recovery after a recession is not the number of jobs created, but rather the amount of cold, hard cash it is delivering to workers. That is measured by real aggregate wages. This number is the product of average hourly earnings for nonsupervisory workers, times average hours worked, times the number of jobs, and then divided by the consumer price index
As of the last employment report, we are now exactly 6 years past the trough in real aggregate wages from the Great Recession. So how does the current expansion stack up? Here are the graphs of all economic expansions going back to 1964 (the inception of the series) with the result indexed to 100 at the bottom. First up is the big picture from 1964-present:
Here is our current expansion:
The current expansion trails three others. The best is 1964-70:
The next best is the 1990s tech boom:
And the 3rd is the Reagan era of the 1980s:
But the current expansion also is better than 3 others.
Here is the early 1970s:
Here is the late 1970s:
These two delivered more wage growth initially, but it didn't last because the economy fell back into recession quickly.
But the worst by any measure is the George W. Bush expansion of a decade ago:
This delivered weaker wage growth, over a short period, and fell back into the worst recession in 75 years.
So here is the handy comparison chart of real aggregate wage growth during all of the expansions of the last 50 years:
at 6 years
*start of series
***Measured through the next recession, as recovery was short-lived
Bottom line: the current expansion isn't great, but it hasn't been poor either. If it lasts another year or so, it may overtake the 1980s to land in third place.