Real PCEs are now above their peak from the previous recession.
Real service expenditures (which account for about 65% of PCEs) dropped during the recession, but are now right at their previous highs from the previous expansion.
Real non-durable PCEs (which account for 22.18% of PCEs) are now at levels above previous highs. Also note they have bounced back strongly from their lows.
Real durable goods (which account for 12.61% of PCEs) are now approaching their highs from the previous expansion.
Let's look at this data from another perspective: real retail sales:
As this chart shows, real retail sales have also been increasing at a strong rate. Let's compare this expansions recovery rate to other recoveries:
At the end of the 1990s to after the beginning of the previous expansion, real retail sales moved sideways. They started to increase about a year or so into the last expansion. Notice that in this situation, real retail sales dropped to the level of the last recession, but have bounced back faster.
Simply put, the numbers indicate the consumer is bouncing back. PCEs are near peaks seen from the previous expansion. Real retail sales are mirroring fairly closely their performance from the previous expansion as well.

2 comments:
While I don't dispute these aggregate numbers, I wonder: "Which consumers are they who are spending all this money?"
Can you create spending charts like these fo each of the income quartiles, quintiles, or deciles?
I suspect that the top decile is spending far more now than before, while the lower deciles are spending less than before.
Jimdotz -
I'd be interested to see such data as well, but accurate data will be tough to obtain. Methodology is key.
I'll offer an alternative theory: As people pay down their household debts and interest rates remain low, they have more money to spend while still saving. Consumer financial health is improving. Banks should be hurting as a result (explains why the FDIC has so many in receivership), but methinks with the liquidity crisis over the economy should be able to absorb a slower round of failures.
Anyway, it's speculation until we get quality data to look at.
Post a Comment