Going to a local art festival with my girlfriend. She's the only person who can get me away from the markets.
Back sometime tomorrow.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
Friday, March 23, 2007
The Market's Last Week
Let's take a look at the charts to see what happened last week
The SPYS had a nice upward bias through mid-Wednesday. They spiked after the Fed announcement then consolidated for the rest of the week.
The QQQQs rose a a bit until mid-Tuesday when they consolidated their gains. Then they spiked after the Fed announcement and consolidated for the rest of the week.
The IWNs rallied from Tuesday morning until the Fed announcement, then rallied hard on the rate announcement. Like the other two averages, they consolidated gains for the rest of the week.
All three charts are solid charts going forward -- all three have strong upward momentum.
Looking at all three charts from the daily perspective, all three closed the week out below important resistance levels. If the markets want to continue higher they will have to cross and cloase above these levels.
The SPYS had a nice upward bias through mid-Wednesday. They spiked after the Fed announcement then consolidated for the rest of the week.
The QQQQs rose a a bit until mid-Tuesday when they consolidated their gains. Then they spiked after the Fed announcement and consolidated for the rest of the week.
The IWNs rallied from Tuesday morning until the Fed announcement, then rallied hard on the rate announcement. Like the other two averages, they consolidated gains for the rest of the week.
All three charts are solid charts going forward -- all three have strong upward momentum.
Looking at all three charts from the daily perspective, all three closed the week out below important resistance levels. If the markets want to continue higher they will have to cross and cloase above these levels.
Existing Home Sales Increase Most in three Years
From Bloomberg:
Steady interest rates were a reason for the increase:
OK -- now the bad news:
To sum up, sales increased because prices are dropping. But inventory levels are still increasing. Also note that from a raw, total numbers perspective, the total number of existing homes on the market has only dropped 2.84% since July of last year. That means sales haven't really made a huge dent in the inventory on the market. While the market is never "cleared", it should come down a bit more than it has.
Going forward prices will probably have to drop more to clear the market.
Sales of previously owned homes in the U.S. unexpectedly rose in February at the fastest pace in three years, a sign the housing market is still recovering even as lending standards tighten.
Purchases increased 3.9 percent last month to an annual rate of 6.69 million, from 6.44 million in January, the National Association of Realtors said today in Washington. Sales were down 3.6 percent from a year earlier.
The report, together with a gain in February housing starts reported this week, bolsters the view that housing will gradually stop being a drag on economic growth. Falling prices and low borrowing costs are supporting demand, easing concern that defaults on subprime mortgages will worsen the glut of homes, economists said.
Steady interest rates were a reason for the increase:
According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage was 6.16 percent in the last week, down from an average of 6.29 percent in February. The 30-year fixed was 6.22 percent in January, and 6.25 percent in February 2006.
OK -- now the bad news:
The national median existing-home price2 for all housing types was $212,800 in February, down 1.3 percent from February 2006 when the median was $215,700. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less.
...
Total housing inventory levels rose 5.9 percent at the end of February to 3.75 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 6.7-month supply at the current sales pace compared with a 6.6-month supply in January. Raw inventories peaked last July at 3.86 million, and supplies topped at 7.4 months in October.
To sum up, sales increased because prices are dropping. But inventory levels are still increasing. Also note that from a raw, total numbers perspective, the total number of existing homes on the market has only dropped 2.84% since July of last year. That means sales haven't really made a huge dent in the inventory on the market. While the market is never "cleared", it should come down a bit more than it has.
Going forward prices will probably have to drop more to clear the market.
How Widespread are Subprime Problems?
Pretty far. From the WSJ (subscription required):
Far from being limited to the subprime market, the data show these risky loan features have become widespread. According to Credit Suisse, the number of no or low documentation loans -- so-called "liar loans" -- has increased to 49% last year from 18% of purchase loans in 2001, a nearly three-fold increase. The investment bank also found that borrowers put up less than a 5% down payment in 46% of all home purchases last year. Inside Mortgage Finance estimates that nontraditional mortgages -- mostly interest-only and pay-option ARMs that allow the borrower to defer paying back principal or even increase the loan balance each month -- which barely existed five years ago, grew to close to a third of all mortgages last year.
The Alt-A market, a middle ground between subprime and prime, has increased seven-fold since 2001 and accounted for 20% of home-purchase loans last year. Fully 81% of Alt-A loans last year were no or low documentation loans, according to First American Loan Performance. Why have borrowers employed this kind of risky financing? Because it was the only way many of them could afford a home in some of the hottest housing markets, where prices more than doubled in five years.
Oil Prices Jump
From IBD:
There's more:
Here's why.
Oil inventories are lower now than they were at this time last year:
And gas inventories are dropping fast and hard:
As a result, gas prices are increasing:
This is why the daily oil chart spiked yesterday:
From a longer term perspective, oil prices appear to be consolidating in a triangle pattern:
I bet the Federal Reserve is not happy about this development....
Some of these charts are from the Department of Energy's This Week in Petroleum
Near-month oil futures shot up on fuel supply fear a day after gov't data showed another big drop in gasoline and heating oil stockpiles. The Fed's near-neutral bias Wed. raised hopes for stronger U.S. growth and energy demand. April RBOB gasoline rose 2.26 cents to $1.9575 a gallon, near Tues.' 7-month high. High gas prices could hit ailing U.S. consumers.
There's more:
Nationwide prices rose 1.8 cents last week to $2.577 a gallon. That's 7 cents higher than a year ago. U.S. gas prices have surged more than 36 cents in the past six weeks.
Demand was up while supplies of both gasoline and crude oil remained below year-ago levels.
Refineries are at capacity and gasoline imports are down. Gas futures are at their highest since August — suggesting retail prices have further to go.
"You put it all together and it's just very bullish for gasoline prices," said Phil Flynn, an energy analyst at Alaron Trading. "Don't expect these problems to go away."
Here's why.
Oil inventories are lower now than they were at this time last year:
And gas inventories are dropping fast and hard:
As a result, gas prices are increasing:
This is why the daily oil chart spiked yesterday:
From a longer term perspective, oil prices appear to be consolidating in a triangle pattern:
I bet the Federal Reserve is not happy about this development....
Some of these charts are from the Department of Energy's This Week in Petroleum
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Countrywide Executives Dumping Stock
From the Street:
That gives me a tremendous feeling of confidence.
Insiders at Countrywide, the nation's largest mortgage lender, have sold $314 million worth of shares in the company just since August. That's according to regulatory filings tracked by Interactive Data Corporation.
The sales include a staggering $94.5 million by chief executive Angelo Mozilo, and $17.5 million by mortgage division chief David Sambol.
That gives me a tremendous feeling of confidence.
Countrywide Financial: 2006 Defaults Could Set a Record
From CNBC:
Just what the housing market needed to hear....
"We believe that declining home prices and other factors ... may produce foreclosures numbers on 2006 originations approaching or exceeding those on loans originated in 2000," Samuels said in remarks.
Just what the housing market needed to hear....
Gas Prices Are Still Rising
From This Week in Petroleum:
Last year we had $3/gallon prices in some areas of the country. This price level caused a great deal of concern. While some people may be thinking the economy can withstand that level of a price shock now because we did last summer, there are some really important differences. The economy has continued at a slow pace of growth. Now consumers have seen the housing market flounder for the better part of the last year. In short, we have seen stagnant growth for a lot longer now. This might have a larger depressing effect on consumer sentiment.
Gasoline prices were up for the seventh consecutive week, increasing 1.8 cents to 257.7 cents per gallon as of March 19, 2007. Prices are now 7.3 cents per gallon higher than at this time last year. All regions reported price increases. East Coast prices were up 2.0 cents to 255.3 cents per gallon, while Midwest prices rose 0.3 cent to 249.0 cents per gallon. Prices for the Gulf Coast were up 1.6 cents to 241.8 cents per gallon. The largest regional increase was in the Rocky Mountains, where prices increased 9.0 cents to 250.2 cents per gallon. West Coast prices were up 2.6 cents to 294.6 cents per gallon, with the average price for regular grade in California up 1.0 cent to 307.8 cents per gallon, 44.3 cents per gallon above last year’s price.
Last year we had $3/gallon prices in some areas of the country. This price level caused a great deal of concern. While some people may be thinking the economy can withstand that level of a price shock now because we did last summer, there are some really important differences. The economy has continued at a slow pace of growth. Now consumers have seen the housing market flounder for the better part of the last year. In short, we have seen stagnant growth for a lot longer now. This might have a larger depressing effect on consumer sentiment.
The Fed is Caught Between A Rock and A Hard Place
From the AP:
Let's look at the overall numbers.
GDP growth has been "below full potential". It grew at a pace of 2%, 2.6% and 2.2% in the second - fourth quarter of 2006, respectively. Housing has the big reason as it decreased 11%, 19% and 19% in the same quarters.
At the same time, inflation has increased. Here's a year-over-year chart of core CPI:
Yesterday the markets were just thrilled about the possibility of a rate cut. But they forgot about inflation. Assuming all things remain the same, the Fed won't be lowering rates anytime soon.
Right now it sucks to be a Central Banker.
"The Fed is caught right now. The inflation numbers are looking worse, but on the other hand, the economy is looking softer," said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York.
Wyss said he believed the Fed was using the statement to edge closer to cutting rates if necessary to bolster economic growth, but he said investors should not expect any change at the Fed's next meeting on May 9.
David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors, a private consulting firm, said he believed the Fed would remain on hold probably until September.
"The Fed is facing a standoff. The economy is slowing and inflation is getting worse," Jones said. "They have got to let the dust settle on this very mixed picture before they do anything."
Wyss said the Fed could cut rates as many as three times although he said some of those reductions might not come until next year.
Jones said he believed the Fed might be content to just cut rates once in the second half of this year if the economy is showing signs of rebounding at that time.
Let's look at the overall numbers.
GDP growth has been "below full potential". It grew at a pace of 2%, 2.6% and 2.2% in the second - fourth quarter of 2006, respectively. Housing has the big reason as it decreased 11%, 19% and 19% in the same quarters.
At the same time, inflation has increased. Here's a year-over-year chart of core CPI:
Yesterday the markets were just thrilled about the possibility of a rate cut. But they forgot about inflation. Assuming all things remain the same, the Fed won't be lowering rates anytime soon.
Right now it sucks to be a Central Banker.
More On Yesterday's Markets
Yesterday the markets rallied after the Fed issued its policy statement. The overall averages were up on strong volume which is a bullish event. Let's look at a few of the largest market sectors to see where the real action was.
The financials did very well, mirroring the market's move with a strong bar on big volume.
Consumer Discretionary also rose on solid volume
While technology rose, notice the volume wasn't anywhere near as strong.
And while the energy sector had decent volume, it wasn't anything like the level in the financials are consumer discretionary ETFs.
Food for thought.
The financials did very well, mirroring the market's move with a strong bar on big volume.
Consumer Discretionary also rose on solid volume
While technology rose, notice the volume wasn't anywhere near as strong.
And while the energy sector had decent volume, it wasn't anything like the level in the financials are consumer discretionary ETFs.
Food for thought.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Inflation Picture -- It's Not That Good
This chart is from the blog The Mess That Greenspan Made. When looking at it, remember the Fed's inflation target is 1% - 2%.
The Markets Today
OK -- despite the fact I disagree strongly with how the market interpreted the Fed's statement (see below), the markets rallied strongly to the Fed's news. Notice two things about today's charts.
1.) The markets rallied as soon as the Fed released their statement.
2.) The markets closed near their highs on strong volume.
Here's the 3-month chart of the markets. Notice that today's rally printed a very strong bar on very strong volume. The IWN's volume is a bit weaker than the SPYs and QQQQs, but it is still higher than previous days.
1.) The markets rallied as soon as the Fed released their statement.
2.) The markets closed near their highs on strong volume.
Here's the 3-month chart of the markets. Notice that today's rally printed a very strong bar on very strong volume. The IWN's volume is a bit weaker than the SPYs and QQQQs, but it is still higher than previous days.
Fed Keeps Rates Unchanged; Inflation Still a Concern
Here's the text of their statement:
Translation: Inflation is too high; it hasn't come down as expected. We're still expecting a slowing economy to lower inflation.
We're not lowering rates anytime soon.
The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to keep its target for the federal funds rate at 5-1/4 percent.
Recent indicators have been mixed and the adjustment in the housing sector is ongoing. Nevertheless, the economy seems likely to continue to expand at a moderate pace over coming quarters.
Recent readings on core inflation have been somewhat elevated. Although inflation pressures seem likely to moderate over time, the high level of resource utilization has the potential to sustain those pressures.
In these circumstances, the Committee's predominant policy concern remains the risk that inflation will fail to moderate as expected. Future policy adjustments will depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as implied by incoming information.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Thomas M. Hoenig; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Cathy E. Minehan; Frederic S. Mishkin; Michael H. Moskow; William Poole; and Kevin M. Warsh.
Translation: Inflation is too high; it hasn't come down as expected. We're still expecting a slowing economy to lower inflation.
We're not lowering rates anytime soon.
Dollar Update
The US Dollar is Still in a Downtrend. Here is the daily chart.
Notice the dollar consolidated in a rectangle or head and shoulders patters from mid-January to early February. Since then it has sold off making lower highs and lower lows. In other words, the short-term trend is is bearish.
Here's the weekly chart which also shows a bearish trend:
We had a bear market rally from May to June of last year, but the buying pressure was not strong enough to break the downtrend. Also note that all three moving averages on this chart -- a 20, 50 and 200 day simple moving average -- are all pointing lower.
Notice the dollar consolidated in a rectangle or head and shoulders patters from mid-January to early February. Since then it has sold off making lower highs and lower lows. In other words, the short-term trend is is bearish.
Here's the weekly chart which also shows a bearish trend:
We had a bear market rally from May to June of last year, but the buying pressure was not strong enough to break the downtrend. Also note that all three moving averages on this chart -- a 20, 50 and 200 day simple moving average -- are all pointing lower.
Oil Demand Increasing
From CBS MarketWatch:
In other words, don't be surprised to see oil prices rebound in the next few months.
Econ 101: increasing demand = increasing price.
And "with the energy demand showing no signs of abating, there seems to be a growing concern that OPEC's decision to keep output unchanged might result in a supply shortfall, which could leave refineries unable to boost runs enough to replenish gasoline supplies, setting the stage for a sharp upward price spiral," he said in an e-mailed note to clients.
Francisco Blanch, an analyst at Merrill Lynch, said in a research note Tuesday that oil demand is "expanding strongly relative to last year in sectors such as transportation, petrochemicals and power generation." And in emerging markets, oil demand is "looking very strong with China, India and other countries taking in substantially more fuel for transport and petchem use than last year," he said.
In other words, don't be surprised to see oil prices rebound in the next few months.
Econ 101: increasing demand = increasing price.
Housing Short Sales Increasing
From Bloomberg:
Basically the owner turns over the house to the mortgage company, who in turn puts the house on the market or quickly sells the house to a private investor. This gets the house off of the companies books and may help to prevent a longer-term loss for the bank/lender.
However, this practice will drive prices down as the seller is very motivated to sell and therefore will accept a lower price.
The problem is no one tracks this market so we have no idea what the actual impact it.
Homeowners such as the Rhode Island couple are finding their mortgage companies eager to accept a sale price that falls short of a property's loan balance -- a so-called mortgage short sale. The number of U.S. loans entering foreclosure reached an all-time high in the fourth quarter, according to the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers Association. That's spawning a cottage industry of real estate investors who profit as lenders try to avoid adding properties to their portfolios.
Basically the owner turns over the house to the mortgage company, who in turn puts the house on the market or quickly sells the house to a private investor. This gets the house off of the companies books and may help to prevent a longer-term loss for the bank/lender.
However, this practice will drive prices down as the seller is very motivated to sell and therefore will accept a lower price.
The short sales may mitigate the impact of the housing slump as the properties avoid being tallied as foreclosures. At the same time, they will help push the U.S. median home price to a third consecutive quarterly decline in 2007's first three months, Berson said.
The problem is no one tracks this market so we have no idea what the actual impact it.
Fed Day
The Federal Reserve will announce its interest rate decision at 2:15 EST today. Don't expect a major change in interest rate policy because it won't happen. However, the entire financial world as we know it will stop until 2:15 EST.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Credit Standards Are Tightening
From Bloomberg:
And housing starts increased today. Just who is going to buy those new houses? Total household debt is now over 90% of total US GDP; debt payments as a percentage of disposable income are at a record. How must more debt can the US consumer put on his books?
......Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest U.S. mortgage provider, last week stopped taking applications for no- money-down loans from risky borrowers without proof of income.
The new constraints on lending may be real-world evidence of the ``lags'' in monetary policy that policy makers flagged when they ended two years of rate increases in August. The central bank will keep its benchmark rate at 5.25 percent, economists predict, counting on slower growth and past rate boosts to bring inflation within their tolerance zone.
``The market is definitely tightening standards, and to the degree the market controls the flow of capital, the Fed does not have to,'' said Carl Tannenbaum, chief economist at ABN Amro Holding NV's LaSalle Bank in Chicago. Officials have kept their tightening bias at the past five meetings, meaning any policy shift is likely to be a rate increase.
.....Wells Fargo & Co., the largest U.S. subprime lender, said in a March 7 statement to Bloomberg News that it changed standards effective Feb. 16 for some risky customers.
And housing starts increased today. Just who is going to buy those new houses? Total household debt is now over 90% of total US GDP; debt payments as a percentage of disposable income are at a record. How must more debt can the US consumer put on his books?
The Latest Rally is Suspect
While prices have increased for the SPYs and QQQQs, volume has decreased. This is a bearish signal.
My guess is traders are waiting on the sidelines for the Fed's decision tomorrow. I don't think anybody thinks the Fed will do anything about rates. Instead I think people are waiting for the Fed's statement to see if anything has really changed.
My guess is traders are waiting on the sidelines for the Fed's decision tomorrow. I don't think anybody thinks the Fed will do anything about rates. Instead I think people are waiting for the Fed's statement to see if anything has really changed.
Housing Starts Increase
From Bloomberg:
The South and West rose 18% and 26.4% respectively. These figures are the primary reason for the increase, as the Northeast dropped 19.7% and the Midwest dropped 14.4%.
Frankly, I have a hard time explaining these numbers. According to the latest new home sales report there is a 6.8 month supply of new homes on the market. In addition, new home sales were down 20% year-over year. Credit standards are tightening. And there are estimates of the subprime problems adding between 500,000 to 1.5 million homes to inventory. This is not the time to be adding to available inventory.
Housing starts rebounded in February from a nine-year low, easing concern that the U.S. real-estate slump will worsen and threaten the economic expansion.
Builders broke ground on new homes at an annual rate of 1.525 million last month, up 9 percent from the prior month and more than economists forecast, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Building permits fell 2.5 percent.
The numbers eased speculation that climbing defaults on subprime mortgages would put additional homes on the market, leading builders to halt more projects and fire workers. At the same time, swings in the monthly figures don't convey the stability desired by Federal Reserve policy makers, who meet today and tomorrow to set interest rates.
The South and West rose 18% and 26.4% respectively. These figures are the primary reason for the increase, as the Northeast dropped 19.7% and the Midwest dropped 14.4%.
Frankly, I have a hard time explaining these numbers. According to the latest new home sales report there is a 6.8 month supply of new homes on the market. In addition, new home sales were down 20% year-over year. Credit standards are tightening. And there are estimates of the subprime problems adding between 500,000 to 1.5 million homes to inventory. This is not the time to be adding to available inventory.
More Subprime Problems
From IBD:
There's been a steady drip drip drip of bad news from the subprime sector for the last few months. This is simply another one of those drips.
So far the damage has been contained. But I wonder how much longer that will last. While most mortgages are pooled, securitized and sold to investors there are still companies that hold mortgages on their books. Yesterday I linked to an article by Kash over at the streetlight which showed banks are more exposed to this problem then we want to admit.
I have no idea if the proverbial dam is going to burst on this issue. But the signs are definitely worrying.
The big subprime mortgage lender said 4 more states have issued cease-and-desist orders, joining N.Y. and Mass. Deutsche Bank (DB) asked New Century Fin'l (NEWC) to quickly buy back $900 mil of its loans. New Century fell 7% to 2.17. Accredited Home Lenders, (LEND) which rallied in pre-market on financing talks, fell 18%. Fremont Gen'l, (FMT) which wants to sell its subprime unit, fell 9%.
There's been a steady drip drip drip of bad news from the subprime sector for the last few months. This is simply another one of those drips.
So far the damage has been contained. But I wonder how much longer that will last. While most mortgages are pooled, securitized and sold to investors there are still companies that hold mortgages on their books. Yesterday I linked to an article by Kash over at the streetlight which showed banks are more exposed to this problem then we want to admit.
I have no idea if the proverbial dam is going to burst on this issue. But the signs are definitely worrying.
Yesterday's Rally Occurred on Weak Volume
From IBD:
Volume is one of the best technical indicators around because it shows the actual level of activity and/or enthusiasm. The reasoning is simple: if people are really excited about buying something more people will participate in the rally. If people aren't excited, they won't.
One of the oldest and most reliable technical indicators out there is a rally on continually decreasing volume. A rally on decreasing volume indicates people are less and less excited about an issue and the therefore the price is about to drop.
Food for thought.
Stocks rallied Monday, but sharply lighter volume took the juice out of the session's gains.
The Nasdaq picked up 0.9%. The S&P 500 climbed 1.1%, the Dow industrials 1%. The small-cap S&P 600 also tacked on 1%. But volume receded 19% on the Nasdaq and nearly 30% on the NYSE.
.....
Two factors weighed on Monday's volume. The lack of option-fueled trading certainly played a part. Big investors also were reluctant to trade heavily ahead of the two-day Federal Open Market Committee meeting that begins Tuesday.
Still, Monday's trading level came in below Thursday's tally, and was the second-lowest total since the last week of 2006, when traders stayed home for the holidays.
Volume is one of the best technical indicators around because it shows the actual level of activity and/or enthusiasm. The reasoning is simple: if people are really excited about buying something more people will participate in the rally. If people aren't excited, they won't.
One of the oldest and most reliable technical indicators out there is a rally on continually decreasing volume. A rally on decreasing volume indicates people are less and less excited about an issue and the therefore the price is about to drop.
Food for thought.
Bank of Japan Leaves Rates Unchanged
From the WSJ:
The carry trade -- borrowing in Japan at low rates and lending in the US at higher rates -- has been an important source of financing for hedge funds for the last 5+ years. So long as the interest rate differential is still advantageous for the trade it will continue.
Tomorrow the US Federal Reserve will issue its interest rate policy decision. While there has been speculation the Fed will lower rates soon, I still think that is wishful thinking. We'll have to see how their official statement comes out, but I doubt we'll see much meaningful change.
Bank of Japan board members Tuesday voted unanimously to leave monetary policy steady, in line with indications from the central bank that it wouldn't immediately follow a rate rise in February with a further policy tightening.
Analysts expect the BOJ to raise interest rates further but not until economic data show domestic demand is picking up and price pressures increase after moderating due to a recent fall in global oil prices.
The carry trade -- borrowing in Japan at low rates and lending in the US at higher rates -- has been an important source of financing for hedge funds for the last 5+ years. So long as the interest rate differential is still advantageous for the trade it will continue.
Tomorrow the US Federal Reserve will issue its interest rate policy decision. While there has been speculation the Fed will lower rates soon, I still think that is wishful thinking. We'll have to see how their official statement comes out, but I doubt we'll see much meaningful change.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Homebuilder Confidence Drops
From Bloomberg:
CBS Marketwatch added:
There has been a pretty big debate between the housing bulls and bears over the last 3-5 months. I have been a housing bear for some time, largely because of the huge inventory overhang. The subprime situation has only increased the level of my bearishness. This news simply ups the ante some more. When industry participants are concerned you have to wonder about the overall health of the industry.
U.S. homebuilders turned more pessimistic this month on concern that buyers will find it harder to obtain loans after a wave of defaults in the subprime mortgage market.
The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo index of sentiment fell to 36 this month from February's revised 39, the first decline since September, the Washington-based association said today. A reading below 50 means most respondents view conditions as poor.
Homebuilders, struggling to recover after more than a year of slumping sales, now face the possibility that a surge in defaults on subprime mortgages will make other types of home loans harder to get. That may provide a greater drag on construction as builders hold off starting work on more houses until completed ones are sold.
CBS Marketwatch added:
"This is a strong signal that housing will remain a drag on the economy through spring and probably summer as well," wrote Patrick McPherron, an economist for Moody's Economy.com. He concluded that, after seasonally adjusting the numbers, optimism about prospective buyers was an all-time low.
There has been a pretty big debate between the housing bulls and bears over the last 3-5 months. I have been a housing bear for some time, largely because of the huge inventory overhang. The subprime situation has only increased the level of my bearishness. This news simply ups the ante some more. When industry participants are concerned you have to wonder about the overall health of the industry.
Our Low-Wage Nation
Of the 44 million jobs in the United States, nearly one in three of the total pays low wages—and often does not include affordable health insurance, paid sick days or retirement coverage. That eye-opening information, provided in a new report by The Mobility Agenda, finds these $11.11-an-hour-or-less jobs also tend to have inflexible or unpredictable scheduling requirements and provide little opportunity for career advancement.
So maybe that’s why when Bush touts the nation’s low unemployment rate, few people outside Wall Street cheer. They are too busy working several jobs to make ends meet.
The Mobility Agenda, a special initiative of Inclusion, a virtual think tank affiliated with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, finds that since 2001, there has been a sharp decline in wages for workers at the bottom third of the wage scale. Worse, reviewing the evidence on economic mobility, the authors of Understanding Low-Wage Work in the United States conclude:
In the U.S. labor market, it is not possible for everyone to be middle class, no matter how hard they work. Moreover, it has been getting harder to do over time.
Oh, and about that middle class. A devastating report by Robert Pear in The New York Times March 5 documents the economic fragility of the U.S. middle class when it comes to paying for health care.
Seems that more than one-third of those without health insurance—17 million of the nearly 47 million—have family incomes of $40,000 or more, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonpartisan organization. More than two-thirds of the uninsured are in households with at least one full-time worker. As Pear writes:
It is well known that the ranks of the uninsured have been swelling; federal figures show an increase of 6.8 million since 2000.
(The AFL-CIO supports universal health care, and last week, the AFL-CIO Executive Council approved a statement saying such a system should be built upon the nation’s most successful universal health coverage plan for seniors—Medicare.)
A confluence of forces is behind the sinking of the middle class. But one big factor is the disproportionate gain by corporations in the growing global economy. So wide is the gap, in fact, that even the denizens of economic world leadership, at their annual gathering in Davos, Switzerland, this year started humming a new refrain: Globalization isn't working for everyone. According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required):
Stagnating wages and rising job insecurity in developed countries are creating popular disenchantment with the free movement of goods, capital and people across borders.
In theory, less-developed countries win from globalization because they get jobs making low-cost products for rich countries. Rich countries win because, in addition to being able to buy inexpensive imports, they also can sell more sophisticated products like machine tools or financial services to emerging economies.
"The first win is there, but the second win is going to the owners of capital rather than labor," says Stephen Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.
Ouch. There’s that capital-and-labor dichotomy again. From Morgan Stanley, no less. Guess it didn’t go away with the 20th century after all.
Several key factors are fueling the inequities in globalization. One is the rapid growth of foreign direct investment by U.S. corporations to other countries—while internal investment is decreasing. According to economist Thomas Palley:
Since investment in the U.S. is critical for future economic prosperity, these patterns are troubling and provide evidence of how globalization and flawed policy are encouraging corporations to abandon America.
With regard to outward [foreign direct investment], part of the increase is attributable to affirmative improvements in emerging market economy prospects, but part is due to bad policy. The over-valued dollar has encouraged U.S. business to shift productive investments from the U.S. to both developing and other developed economies, while the lack of global labor and environmental standards encourages shifts to developing economies where standards are lower or even absent.
Another factor is the preferential tax treatment of foreign profits of U.S. corporations, which encourages outward FDI that displaces domestic investment. This speaks to repealing that provision.
Palley notes the U.S. Commerce Department recently launched an initiative to promote such investment, promising to actively court foreign companies. But the approach, while beneficial, also is “incomplete and inadequate.”
Cheerleading cannot substitute for fundamental policy change...the exclusive focus on [internal direct investment] is like one-hand clapping and completely misses the problem of investment off-shoring by U.S. corporations.
Another factor exacerbating the gap between what the wealthy are paid and everyone else is excessive CEO pay. We’ll discuss that in a couple weeks, when the AFL-CIO releases its Executive PayWatch report in early April.
Source: http://www.inclusionist.org/files/lowwagework.pdf
So maybe that’s why when Bush touts the nation’s low unemployment rate, few people outside Wall Street cheer. They are too busy working several jobs to make ends meet.
The Mobility Agenda, a special initiative of Inclusion, a virtual think tank affiliated with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, finds that since 2001, there has been a sharp decline in wages for workers at the bottom third of the wage scale. Worse, reviewing the evidence on economic mobility, the authors of Understanding Low-Wage Work in the United States conclude:
In the U.S. labor market, it is not possible for everyone to be middle class, no matter how hard they work. Moreover, it has been getting harder to do over time.
Oh, and about that middle class. A devastating report by Robert Pear in The New York Times March 5 documents the economic fragility of the U.S. middle class when it comes to paying for health care.
Seems that more than one-third of those without health insurance—17 million of the nearly 47 million—have family incomes of $40,000 or more, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonpartisan organization. More than two-thirds of the uninsured are in households with at least one full-time worker. As Pear writes:
It is well known that the ranks of the uninsured have been swelling; federal figures show an increase of 6.8 million since 2000.
(The AFL-CIO supports universal health care, and last week, the AFL-CIO Executive Council approved a statement saying such a system should be built upon the nation’s most successful universal health coverage plan for seniors—Medicare.)
A confluence of forces is behind the sinking of the middle class. But one big factor is the disproportionate gain by corporations in the growing global economy. So wide is the gap, in fact, that even the denizens of economic world leadership, at their annual gathering in Davos, Switzerland, this year started humming a new refrain: Globalization isn't working for everyone. According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required):
Stagnating wages and rising job insecurity in developed countries are creating popular disenchantment with the free movement of goods, capital and people across borders.
In theory, less-developed countries win from globalization because they get jobs making low-cost products for rich countries. Rich countries win because, in addition to being able to buy inexpensive imports, they also can sell more sophisticated products like machine tools or financial services to emerging economies.
"The first win is there, but the second win is going to the owners of capital rather than labor," says Stephen Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.
Ouch. There’s that capital-and-labor dichotomy again. From Morgan Stanley, no less. Guess it didn’t go away with the 20th century after all.
Several key factors are fueling the inequities in globalization. One is the rapid growth of foreign direct investment by U.S. corporations to other countries—while internal investment is decreasing. According to economist Thomas Palley:
Since investment in the U.S. is critical for future economic prosperity, these patterns are troubling and provide evidence of how globalization and flawed policy are encouraging corporations to abandon America.
With regard to outward [foreign direct investment], part of the increase is attributable to affirmative improvements in emerging market economy prospects, but part is due to bad policy. The over-valued dollar has encouraged U.S. business to shift productive investments from the U.S. to both developing and other developed economies, while the lack of global labor and environmental standards encourages shifts to developing economies where standards are lower or even absent.
Another factor is the preferential tax treatment of foreign profits of U.S. corporations, which encourages outward FDI that displaces domestic investment. This speaks to repealing that provision.
Palley notes the U.S. Commerce Department recently launched an initiative to promote such investment, promising to actively court foreign companies. But the approach, while beneficial, also is “incomplete and inadequate.”
Cheerleading cannot substitute for fundamental policy change...the exclusive focus on [internal direct investment] is like one-hand clapping and completely misses the problem of investment off-shoring by U.S. corporations.
Another factor exacerbating the gap between what the wealthy are paid and everyone else is excessive CEO pay. We’ll discuss that in a couple weeks, when the AFL-CIO releases its Executive PayWatch report in early April.
Source: http://www.inclusionist.org/files/lowwagework.pdf
Go Read This Now
Kash at the Streetlight Blog looks at banks exposure to real estate.
It's not a fun read, but a crucial read.
It's not a fun read, but a crucial read.
Can We Please Stop With the Rate Cut Talk?
From Bloomberg:
Fed officials have been very clear in their public speeches over the last few months. All of them -- let me repeat that ALL OF THEM, AS IN EVERY LAST ONE, AS IN NO ONE HAS SAID ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY -- have said inflation is too high.
The Year-over-year CPI number is 2.7% -- way above the Fed's publicly stated inflation target of 1%-2%. That means inflation has to come way down before the Fed will cut rates.
Now, the Fed could change their bias from anti-inflation to growth. But they haven't said that yet.
Federal Reserve officials may cling this week to their bias for tighter credit, setting themselves up for bigger interest-rate cuts later in the year if the economy continues to lose momentum.
``The Fed is often a little behind the curve when you get to these turning points,'' says J. Alfred Broaddus Jr., president of the Richmond Fed from 1993 to 2004. ``The reluctance to move toward ease once you have an inflation bias in place may be just a fact of life if you are concerned about credibility.''
Fed officials have been very clear in their public speeches over the last few months. All of them -- let me repeat that ALL OF THEM, AS IN EVERY LAST ONE, AS IN NO ONE HAS SAID ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY -- have said inflation is too high.
The Year-over-year CPI number is 2.7% -- way above the Fed's publicly stated inflation target of 1%-2%. That means inflation has to come way down before the Fed will cut rates.
Now, the Fed could change their bias from anti-inflation to growth. But they haven't said that yet.
Oil Market Update
Here's a daily chart for oil:
The market gapped down last week. Now it's resting on the 50-day SMA. Gaps down are usually bearish signals, as they indicate selling pressure is strong enough to force prices to open lower.
Here's a weekly chart to place last week's action in longer-term perspective. I'm going to put this one up twice with two different analysis.
The oil market broke the downtrend. Now the downtrend may move from resistance to support. We'll have to wait until Friday to see how this closes.
Here's another look:
Oil is consolidating in a triangle formation.
Let me add my standard TA caveat: TA isn't an exact science; the markets will do anything and everything they can to make an ass of you.
The market gapped down last week. Now it's resting on the 50-day SMA. Gaps down are usually bearish signals, as they indicate selling pressure is strong enough to force prices to open lower.
Here's a weekly chart to place last week's action in longer-term perspective. I'm going to put this one up twice with two different analysis.
The oil market broke the downtrend. Now the downtrend may move from resistance to support. We'll have to wait until Friday to see how this closes.
Here's another look:
Oil is consolidating in a triangle formation.
Let me add my standard TA caveat: TA isn't an exact science; the markets will do anything and everything they can to make an ass of you.
Keep Your Eye On Financial Stocks
From the WSJ:
Let's take a look at the longer-term Financial ETF to see what the sector looks like.
This chart says it all. Prices are moving lower on higher volume. That indicates selling momentum is increasing which is a bearish signal.
Here's the weekly chart, which shows a few years of price action:
We're still in an uptrend. However, notice the volume spikes over the last three weeks and the downward price movement. If the XLFs move over (roughly) $34.25 on heavy volume, close at that level then stay there for a few days, then the uptrend of the last few years will be broken. That will be a technically important market event and could signal further downward price action for the overall market.
A look at the losers and bigger losers since the stock market began its bumpy ride late last month offers hints about what it will take for the market to rebound in the weeks ahead.
Analysts are keeping an especially close eye on financial stocks, which, beset by woes in the business of selling mortgages to risky subprime borrowers, have been the hardest hit. The sector is something of a bellwether for the market because of its size and because it reflects big-picture economic issues such as inflation.
The financial sector of the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 index is off 5.5% since the market's one-day plunge on Feb. 27, compared with a 4.4% drop for the whole index. The utilities sector, an investor haven because consumers need to keep the lights on and the water running no matter how shaky the economy, is down just 2.9% in the same period, the second-best performance of the index's 10 sectors.
"Investors have clearly been trying to get more defensive in their portfolios the last few weeks, which is understandable," says strategist Mark Keller of A.G. Edwards & Sons in St. Louis. "They're still in a mode of shedding risk, and things should stay that way awhile longer."
Let's take a look at the longer-term Financial ETF to see what the sector looks like.
This chart says it all. Prices are moving lower on higher volume. That indicates selling momentum is increasing which is a bearish signal.
Here's the weekly chart, which shows a few years of price action:
We're still in an uptrend. However, notice the volume spikes over the last three weeks and the downward price movement. If the XLFs move over (roughly) $34.25 on heavy volume, close at that level then stay there for a few days, then the uptrend of the last few years will be broken. That will be a technically important market event and could signal further downward price action for the overall market.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Inflation Isn't Under Control
From Business Week:
A few points:
1.) A central tenant of central bank thinking over the last 6-9 months is that a slowing economy would lead to lower inflation. That hasn't materialized yet. While oil prices are down, they certainly aren't deflationary yet. And agricultural prices are rising, indicating they may take oil's place as the inflation area of concern.
2.) All of the fed governors have publicly stated inflation is still too high. This implies we are nowhere near a rate cut even if the economy slows.
3.) We are nowhere near stagflation. While the overall inflation level is still a concern, it is hardly at out-of-control or runaway levels. However, the overall inflation level is still way too high to consider a rate cut.
Core year-over-year CPI price growth, at 2.7%, is above the Fed's preferred 2% soft target for this measure that is roughly consistent with the 1%-2% comfort zone for the core chain price index for personal consumption. And the headline year-over-year gain moved upward to 2.4% from 2.1%. The core year-over-year rate may drift down toward the 2.5% area through mid-year due to easier comparisons, but this may not suit a Fed that would probably like to see the figures "comfortably" and sustainably within the preferred range, and not just dancing at the upper end.
A few points:
1.) A central tenant of central bank thinking over the last 6-9 months is that a slowing economy would lead to lower inflation. That hasn't materialized yet. While oil prices are down, they certainly aren't deflationary yet. And agricultural prices are rising, indicating they may take oil's place as the inflation area of concern.
2.) All of the fed governors have publicly stated inflation is still too high. This implies we are nowhere near a rate cut even if the economy slows.
3.) We are nowhere near stagflation. While the overall inflation level is still a concern, it is hardly at out-of-control or runaway levels. However, the overall inflation level is still way too high to consider a rate cut.
How Confident Are Consumers?
I have never been a huge fan of surveys about what people say; I've always thought people's actions were far more important. Who wants to sound like a grump? But when people are spending less, it means that much more.
Before we get any further, let's make an assumption: people buy houses and cars when they are feeling more confident about the future. This has been a standard line of economic reasoning for awhile. People need to feel confident about the future in order to take on a financial responsibility that will last at least 5 years.
If the preceding statement is true, consumer confidence may not be that high. According to Barron's pulse of the economy we have the following year-over-year figures for car and new home sales.
Total domestic auto sales totaled 567,880 one year ago and 520,946 in February 2007. That's a drop of 8.42%.
Total light truck sales were 692,929 in February 2006 and 694,297 in February 2007. That's an increase of .18%.
New home sales were 1,197,000 in January 2006 and 937,000 in January 2007. That's a decrease of 21.72%.
There are other possible reasons. For example, maybe all of the household debt is starting to slow the purchase of durable goods. Considering the sky-high levels of debt in the economy that may be a possibility.
But whatever the reason, we know people are backing away from big-ticket purchases. That may mean people aren't feeling all that confident right now.
Before we get any further, let's make an assumption: people buy houses and cars when they are feeling more confident about the future. This has been a standard line of economic reasoning for awhile. People need to feel confident about the future in order to take on a financial responsibility that will last at least 5 years.
If the preceding statement is true, consumer confidence may not be that high. According to Barron's pulse of the economy we have the following year-over-year figures for car and new home sales.
Total domestic auto sales totaled 567,880 one year ago and 520,946 in February 2007. That's a drop of 8.42%.
Total light truck sales were 692,929 in February 2006 and 694,297 in February 2007. That's an increase of .18%.
New home sales were 1,197,000 in January 2006 and 937,000 in January 2007. That's a decrease of 21.72%.
There are other possible reasons. For example, maybe all of the household debt is starting to slow the purchase of durable goods. Considering the sky-high levels of debt in the economy that may be a possibility.
But whatever the reason, we know people are backing away from big-ticket purchases. That may mean people aren't feeling all that confident right now.